From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:9488 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760050Ab3DCLMA (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Apr 2013 07:12:00 -0400 Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 08:11:54 -0300 From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab To: Prabhakar Lad Cc: linux-media , Hans Verkuil Subject: Re: Patch update notification: 6 patches updated Message-ID: <20130403081154.30b17878@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20130403103301.9548.49850@www.linuxtv.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Prabhakar, Em Wed, 3 Apr 2013 16:12:09 +0530 Prabhakar Lad escreveu: > Hi Mauro, We're starting to work this week with media sub-mainainers. It will take some time for all sub-maintainers to work the same way. In the specific case of those patches, Hans is the sub-maintainer that will be taking care of them. I'll ask him to double check the status of the patches below. Thanks, Mauro > On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Patchwork wrote: > > Hello, > > > > The following patches (submitted by you) have been updated in patchwork: > > > > * [v3] davinci: vpif: add pm_runtime support > > - http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/17737/ > > was: New > > now: Not Applicable > > > > * [v2,3/3] davinic: vpss: trivial cleanup > > - http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/17733/ > > was: New > > now: Not Applicable > > > > * [v2,2/3] media: davinci: vpbe: venc: move the enabling of vpss clocks to driver > > - http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/17731/ > > was: New > > now: Not Applicable > > > > * davinci: vpif: add pm_runtime support > > - http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/17692/ > > was: Under Review > > now: Not Applicable > > > This should 'suppressed' > > > * [v2,1/3] media: davinci: vpss: enable vpss clocks > > - http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/17732/ > > was: New > > now: Not Applicable > > > > * [v2] davinci: vpif: add pm_runtime support > > - http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/17719/ > > was: New > > now: Not Applicable > > > This should 'suppressed' . > > And the rest of the patches are intended to go via media-tree.git. > > Regards, > --Prabhakar > > > This email is a notification only - you do not need to respond. > > > > - > > > > Patches submitted to linux-media@vger.kernel.org have the following > > possible states: > > > > New: Patches not yet reviewed (typically new patches); > > > > Under review: When it is expected that someone is reviewing it (typically, > > the driver's author or maintainer). Unfortunately, patchwork > > doesn't have a field to indicate who is the driver maintainer. > > If in doubt about who is the driver maintainer please check the > > MAINTAINERS file or ask at the ML; > > > > Superseded: when the same patch is sent twice, or a new version of the > > same patch is sent, and the maintainer identified it, the first > > version is marked as such. It is also used when a patch was > > superseeded by a git pull request. > > > > Obsoleted: patch doesn't apply anymore, because the modified code doesn't > > exist anymore. > > > > Changes requested: when someone requests changes at the patch; > > > > Rejected: When the patch is wrong or doesn't apply. Most of the > > time, 'rejected' and 'changes requested' means the same thing > > for the developer: he'll need to re-work on the patch. > > > > RFC: patches marked as such and other patches that are also RFC, but the > > patch author was not nice enough to mark them as such. That includes: > > - patches sent by a driver's maintainer who send patches > > via git pull requests; > > - patches with a very active community (typically from developers > > working with embedded devices), where lots of versions are > > needed for the driver maintainer and/or the community to be > > happy with. > > > > Not Applicable: for patches that aren't meant to be applicable via > > the media-tree.git. > > > > Accepted: when some driver maintainer says that the patch will be applied > > via his tree, or when everything is ok and it got applied > > either at the main tree or via some other tree (fixes tree; > > some other maintainer's tree - when it belongs to other subsystems, > > etc); > > > > If you think any status change is a mistake, please send an email to the ML. > > > > - > > > > This is an automated mail sent by the patchwork system at > > patchwork.linuxtv.org. To stop receiving these notifications, edit > > your mail settings at: > > http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/mail/ > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- Cheers, Mauro