From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>,
Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>,
CAI Qian <caiqian@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
Steve Best <sbest@redhat.com>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: fix a big-endian bug when an extent is zeroed out
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 08:20:58 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130403122058.GB7741@thunk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130403102204.GA15383@gmail.com>
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 06:22:04PM +0800, Zheng Liu wrote:
> Subject: [PATCH] ext4: fix a big-endian bug when an extent is zeroed out
>
> From: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
>
> When an extent was zeroed out, we forgot to do convert from cpu to le16.
> It could make us hit a BUG_ON when we try to write dirty pages out. So
> fix it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
Thanks for finding this! I think we should push this to Linus right
away, and not wait for the next merge window. The bug has been here
for a long time, but it was unmasked by the fact that we unbroke
extent zeroing in 3.9-rcX.
I have two big questions. (1) Shouldn't Eric Whitney have picked this
up with his ARM pandaboard testing, since IIRC it's big-endian as
well? If not, is there something we can do to improve our testing wrt
to big-endian systems?
And (2) does it make sense to have an inline function
ext4_ext_set_len(len)? It might save some lines of code, but more
importantly, it might make it less likely that we will overlook this
sort of bug in the future.
- Ted
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-03 12:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <863434221.7624846.1364452822093.JavaMail.root@redhat.com>
2013-03-28 6:40 ` s390x: kernel BUG at fs/ext4/inode.c:1591! CAI Qian
2013-03-28 6:40 ` CAI Qian
2013-03-28 9:44 ` CAI Qian
2013-03-28 9:44 ` CAI Qian
2013-03-28 12:05 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-03-28 14:56 ` Dmitry Monakhov
2013-03-29 8:53 ` CAI Qian
2013-03-29 10:08 ` Dmitry Monakhov
2013-03-29 9:27 ` CAI Qian
2013-04-01 6:07 ` Dmitry Monakhov
2013-04-01 6:07 ` Dmitry Monakhov
2013-04-01 6:30 ` CAI Qian
2013-04-01 6:30 ` CAI Qian
2013-04-01 6:56 ` Dmitry Monakhov
2013-04-01 6:56 ` Dmitry Monakhov
2013-04-02 4:06 ` bisected! (WAS Re: s390x: kernel BUG at fs/ext4/inode.c:1591!) CAI Qian
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.10.1304012249440.5874@trent.utfs.org>
2013-04-02 9:47 ` s390x: kernel BUG at fs/ext4/inode.c:1591! (powerpc too!) Dmitry Monakhov
2013-04-02 12:33 ` Zheng Liu
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.10.1304021202100.13746@trent.utfs.org>
2013-04-02 19:49 ` Dmitry Monakhov
2013-04-02 19:49 ` Dmitry Monakhov
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.10.1304020955280.13746@trent.utfs.org>
2013-04-02 17:19 ` Dmitry Monakhov
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.10.1304021430480.13746@trent.utfs.org>
2013-04-02 22:05 ` Dmitry Monakhov
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.10.1304021611020.13746@trent.utfs.org>
2013-04-03 8:52 ` Dmitry Monakhov
2013-04-03 9:53 ` Dmitry Monakhov
2013-04-03 10:22 ` Zheng Liu
2013-04-03 12:20 ` Theodore Ts'o [this message]
2013-04-03 12:29 ` [PATCH] ext4: fix a big-endian bug when an extent is zeroed out Dmitry Monakhov
2013-04-03 14:34 ` Eric Whitney
2013-04-03 14:41 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-04-03 15:23 ` Florian Fainelli
2013-04-03 15:23 ` Florian Fainelli
2013-04-09 3:05 ` CAI Qian
2013-04-20 15:19 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-04-22 3:40 ` CAI Qian
2013-04-22 10:04 ` Christian Borntraeger
2013-04-03 11:02 ` s390x: kernel BUG at fs/ext4/inode.c:1591! (powerpc too!) Dmitry Monakhov
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.10.1304030935230.13746@trent.utfs.org>
2013-04-03 16:50 ` Dmitry Monakhov
2013-04-03 16:52 ` Zheng Liu
2013-04-02 10:01 ` bisected! (WAS Re: s390x: kernel BUG at fs/ext4/inode.c:1591!) Dmitry Monakhov
[not found] ` <876098945.1097253.1364961617725.JavaMail.root@redhat.com>
2013-04-03 7:14 ` CAI Qian
2013-04-03 7:51 ` Dmitry Monakhov
2013-04-03 8:09 ` Lukáš Czerner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130403122058.GB7741@thunk.org \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=caiqian@redhat.com \
--cc=dmonakhov@openvz.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lists@nerdbynature.de \
--cc=sbest@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.