From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Heiko =?iso-8859-15?q?St=FCbner?= Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/14] ARM: samsung-time: Prepare for multiplatform support Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2013 01:15:02 +0200 Message-ID: <201304050115.03879.heiko@sntech.de> References: <1365093431-30621-1-git-send-email-t.figa@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from gloria.sntech.de ([95.129.55.99]:35615 "EHLO gloria.sntech.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1764883Ab3DDXPR (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Apr 2013 19:15:17 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1365093431-30621-1-git-send-email-t.figa@samsung.com> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: Tomasz Figa Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, sameo@linux.intel.com, kgene.kim@samsung.com, kyungmin.park@samsung.com, linux@simtec.co.uk, broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com, kwangwoo.lee@gmail.com, jacmet@sunsite.dk, augulis.darius@gmail.com, mcuelenaere@gmail.com, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, sylvester.nawrocki@gmail.com, buserror@gmail.com, christer@weinigel.se, jekhor@gmail.com, ghcstop@gmail.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, tomasz.figa@gmail.com, robherring2@gmail.com, m.szyprowski@samsung.com, arnd@arndb.de, john.stultz@linaro.org, tglx@linutronix.de Am Donnerstag, 4. April 2013, 18:36:57 schrieb Tomasz Figa: > This series is an attempt to make the samsung-time clocksource driver ready > for multiplatform kernels. It moves the driver to drivers/clocksource, > cleans it up from uses of static platform-specific definitions, simplifies > timer interrupt handling and adds Device Tree support. > > Only samsung-time driver is reworked to use the master driver at this time, > since the PWM driver can be already considered broken at the moment and > needs separate series of several patches to fix and clean it up, which > I am already working on. > > Tested on Universal C210 board with Device Tree. Not tested without > Device Tree, since it has been already broken before this series. > Compile tested for other related SoCs. Looks nice. On a non-DT S3C2416 board: Tested-by: Heiko Stuebner And just so I don't search myself silly, am I right in thinking that the driver does not use the generic clocksource registration yet and dt machines must still use samsung_timer_init at this point? Heiko From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: heiko@sntech.de (Heiko =?iso-8859-15?q?St=FCbner?=) Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2013 01:15:02 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v4 00/14] ARM: samsung-time: Prepare for multiplatform support In-Reply-To: <1365093431-30621-1-git-send-email-t.figa@samsung.com> References: <1365093431-30621-1-git-send-email-t.figa@samsung.com> Message-ID: <201304050115.03879.heiko@sntech.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Am Donnerstag, 4. April 2013, 18:36:57 schrieb Tomasz Figa: > This series is an attempt to make the samsung-time clocksource driver ready > for multiplatform kernels. It moves the driver to drivers/clocksource, > cleans it up from uses of static platform-specific definitions, simplifies > timer interrupt handling and adds Device Tree support. > > Only samsung-time driver is reworked to use the master driver at this time, > since the PWM driver can be already considered broken at the moment and > needs separate series of several patches to fix and clean it up, which > I am already working on. > > Tested on Universal C210 board with Device Tree. Not tested without > Device Tree, since it has been already broken before this series. > Compile tested for other related SoCs. Looks nice. On a non-DT S3C2416 board: Tested-by: Heiko Stuebner And just so I don't search myself silly, am I right in thinking that the driver does not use the generic clocksource registration yet and dt machines must still use samsung_timer_init at this point? Heiko