From: Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>
To: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com>,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, slava@dubeyko.com
Subject: Re: mkfs.f2fs gets stuck with "blk_update_request: bio idx 0 >= vcnt 0" on 3.8
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2013 09:53:27 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130405015327.GA319@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMo8BfKgTPO6AJng6zo1my4K_PivC1gJFQmcvy8q=iDYWSO2Pw@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 06:00:18AM +0400, Max Filippov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 7:41 PM, Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I'm trying to create f2fs filesystem on SD card on pandaboard using
> > f2fs-tools v1.0.0.
> > It works fine on Linus' v3.6, but fails on both v3.8 and stable v3.8.5:
> >
> > # mkfs.f2fs /dev/mmcblk0p3
> > Info: sector size = 512
> > Info: total sectors = 11370496 (in 512bytes)
> > Info: zone aligned segment0 blkaddr: 512
> > [ 257.789764] blk_update_request: bio idx 0 >= vcnt 0
> >
> > mkfs process gets stuck in D state and I see the following in the dmesg:
> >
> > [ 257.789733] __end_that: dev mmcblk0: type=1, flags=122c8081
> > [ 257.789764] sector 4194304, nr/cnr 2981888/4294959104
> > [ 257.789764] bio df3840c0, biotail df3848c0, buffer (null), len 1526726656
> > [ 257.789764] blk_update_request: bio idx 0 >= vcnt 0
> > [ 257.794921] request botched: dev mmcblk0: type=1, flags=122c8081
> > [ 257.794921] sector 4194304, nr/cnr 2981888/4294959104
> > [ 257.794921] bio df3840c0, biotail df3848c0, buffer (null), len 1526726656
>
> [...]
>
> >> So, I think that it needs to investigate issue in the direction of
> >> BLKDISCARD code on the kernel side. It makes sense to debug
> >> f2fs_trim_device() method of mkfs.f2fs utility too. But I can't see
> >> anything strange in this function at a glance.
> >
> > Ok, I'll try to find what has changed in that ioctl handler since 3.6.
>
> the commit 0cfbcafcae8b7364b5fa96c2b26ccde7a3a296a9 'block: add plug
> for blkdev_issue_discard'
> have added merge opportunity for DISCARD requests. When I do
> mkfs.f2fs on a 5G partition (0xad8000 sectors) it submits two bios,
> one for 0x7fe000 sectors (0xffc00000 bytes) and another for
> 0x2da000 sectors (0x5b400000 bytes). Prior to that commit these
> bios weren't merged into one request. Now the second bio gets
> merged with the first, but the request's __data_len field is unsigned int
> and it gets wrapped to 0x5b000000 bytes instead of 0x15b000000
> in the bio_attempt_back_merge. Later this reduced size is passed to
> the blk_update_request causing KERN_ERR and not completed
> request. Reverting this commit fixes mkfs.f2fs for me.
A workaround is setting limits.max_discard_sectors to a smaller value.
So the question is why __data_len isn't sector based? Since disk is sector
based, is there any disk finishing IO in byte granularity? Maybe Jens can
answer.
Thanks,
Shaohua
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-05 1:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-01 17:19 mkfs.f2fs gets stuck with "blk_update_request: bio idx 0 >= vcnt 0" on 3.8 Max Filippov
2013-04-01 19:27 ` Vyacheslav Dubeyko
2013-04-01 20:21 ` Max Filippov
2013-04-02 6:27 ` Vyacheslav Dubeyko
2013-04-02 15:41 ` Max Filippov
2013-04-04 2:00 ` Max Filippov
2013-04-05 1:53 ` Shaohua Li [this message]
2013-04-05 2:18 ` Max Filippov
2013-04-05 7:57 ` Namjae Jeon
2013-04-05 15:01 ` Max Filippov
[not found] ` <CAKYAXd_q2oUiQBoLX77Yurs1OQ5cMACCGSYFOqgjPhxhErp9hA@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CAMo8BfJd9U+HAPqh-6XThHCXMCP35oLEyMXhYhPX_ZE5utD2LQ@mail.gmail.com>
2013-04-07 2:45 ` Namjae Jeon
2013-04-07 1:58 ` Shaohua Li
2013-04-07 2:21 ` Max Filippov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130405015327.GA319@kernel.org \
--to=shli@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=jcmvbkbc@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=slava@dubeyko.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.