From: Philip Kranz <philip.kranz@googlemail.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
Sebastian Wankerl <sisewank@cip.cs.fau.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Philip Kranz <philip.kranz@googlemail.com>,
i4passt@lists.informatik.uni-erlangen.de,
linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add non-zero module sections to sysfs
Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2013 12:40:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130406104053.GA24710@yoda.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1365156435.1970.31.camel@dabdike>
Hello.
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 12:07:15PM +0200, James Bottomley wrote:
> Just so you know: this isn't a parisc specific problem. Gcc produces
> duplicate section names under various circumstances, but the one that
> bites us is -ffunction-sections. Note that there are proposals to use
> -ffunction-sections on all architectures (so we can garbage collect
> unused functions) in which case you'll induce the bug identified in
> 35dead4235e2b67da7275b4122fed37099c2f462 on every architecture
I am not able to produce an object file with duplicate section names
using gcc on x86. Even with -ffunction-sections, every section gets a
unique name. Is this architecture-specific behaviour of gcc?
Greetings,
Philip
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-06 10:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-03 13:08 [PATCH] Add non-zero module sections to sysfs Sebastian Wankerl
2013-04-04 1:00 ` Rusty Russell
2013-04-04 9:40 ` Sebastian Wankerl
2013-04-05 4:00 ` Rusty Russell
2013-04-05 9:40 ` Sebastian Wankerl
2013-04-05 10:07 ` James Bottomley
2013-04-06 4:52 ` Rusty Russell
2013-04-06 10:52 ` James Bottomley
2013-04-06 15:16 ` John David Anglin
2013-04-07 1:22 ` James Bottomley
2013-04-07 1:45 ` John David Anglin
2013-04-06 10:40 ` Philip Kranz [this message]
2013-04-08 4:14 ` Rusty Russell
2013-04-08 11:55 ` Philip Kranz
2013-04-11 14:11 ` Philip Kranz
2013-04-05 14:56 ` Sebastian Wankerl
2013-04-06 4:31 ` Rusty Russell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130406104053.GA24710@yoda.lan \
--to=philip.kranz@googlemail.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=i4passt@lists.informatik.uni-erlangen.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=sisewank@cip.cs.fau.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.