From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jerome Glisse <j.glisse@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] basic UVD support v3
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 10:44:14 -0400
Message-ID: <20130408144413.GA2239@gmail.com>
References: <1365417697-2316-1-git-send-email-deathsimple@vodafone.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <dri-devel-bounces+sf-dri-devel=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from mail-qa0-f42.google.com (mail-qa0-f42.google.com
	[209.85.216.42])
	by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29AA6E6142
	for <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Mon,  8 Apr 2013 07:47:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qa0-f42.google.com with SMTP id bv4so1210465qab.1
	for <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Mon, 08 Apr 2013 07:47:47 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1365417697-2316-1-git-send-email-deathsimple@vodafone.de>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/dri-devel>,
	<mailto:dri-devel-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dri-devel-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel>,
	<mailto:dri-devel-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: dri-devel-bounces+sf-dri-devel=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces+sf-dri-devel=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
To: Christian =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=F6nig?= <deathsimple@vodafone.de>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org

On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 12:41:26PM +0200, Christian K=F6nig wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> =

> Third round of this patchset, and only some stupid typos fixed. I've uplo=
aded this patchset as branch uvd-3.9 to git://people.freedesktop.org/~death=
simple/linux.
> =

> Please review,
> Christian. =


Looks good
Reviewed-by: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>

However i am wondering if it would not have been easier to incorporate
the msg as a new chunk rather as a bo so that you would not have to call
kmap/kunmap on them. But i dunno if GPU writeback stuff to this message
thing (i am guessing so).

Cheers,
Jerome