From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: GENERIC_GPIO considered deprecated Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 21:36:44 +0200 Message-ID: <201304082136.44905.arnd@arndb.de> References: <2c9501ce342b$1535d290$3fa177b0$%kim@samsung.com> <5162EC32.2030602@wwwdotorg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.8]:51046 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S935747Ab3DHTgt (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Apr 2013 15:36:49 -0400 In-Reply-To: <5162EC32.2030602@wwwdotorg.org> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Warren Cc: Kukjin Kim , 'Alexandre Courbot' , Olof Johansson , 'Romain Naour' , 'linux-next' , 'Grant Likely' , 'Linus Walleij' , 'Tomasz Figa' , 'Heiko =?utf-8?q?St=C3=BCbner=27?= , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, ARM kernel mailing list On Monday 08 April 2013, Stephen Warren wrote: > >> > >> Should do the trick, if we can make sure that your tree is merged > >> prior to my patches. > > > > I'm not sure but I think, arm-soc tree should be merged into mainline before others... > > > >> Can you put it into your tree for 3.10? > >> > > I did, so it should be fine. > > > > You may want to discuss how to handle this dependency with the arm-soc > maintainers (CC'd). I'm fine with putting the same branch into arm-soc as well as the gpio tree and anything else that might need it, that tends to be the least invasive way. Arnd From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann) Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 21:36:44 +0200 Subject: GENERIC_GPIO considered deprecated In-Reply-To: <5162EC32.2030602@wwwdotorg.org> References: <2c9501ce342b$1535d290$3fa177b0$%kim@samsung.com> <5162EC32.2030602@wwwdotorg.org> Message-ID: <201304082136.44905.arnd@arndb.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Monday 08 April 2013, Stephen Warren wrote: > >> > >> Should do the trick, if we can make sure that your tree is merged > >> prior to my patches. > > > > I'm not sure but I think, arm-soc tree should be merged into mainline before others... > > > >> Can you put it into your tree for 3.10? > >> > > I did, so it should be fine. > > > > You may want to discuss how to handle this dependency with the arm-soc > maintainers (CC'd). I'm fine with putting the same branch into arm-soc as well as the gpio tree and anything else that might need it, that tends to be the least invasive way. Arnd