Re: [RFC PATCH ipsec] xfrm: use the right dev to fill xdst

[Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>]

On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 03:59:59PM +0300, Daniel Baluta wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Steffen Klassert
> <steffen.klassert@secunet.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 05:12:42PM +0200, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
> >> Commit bc8e4b954e46 (xfrm6: ensure to use the same dev when building a bundle)
> >> broke IPsec for IPv4 over IPv6 tunnels (because dev points to an IPv4 only
> >> interface, hence in6_dev_get(dev) returns NULL.
> >
> > Can you give some informations on how to reproduce this? I'm running
> > interfamily tunnels on our testing environment and it seems to
> > work fine.
> 
> I can hit this in our setup while using some internal custom simulated
> interfaces.
> 
> Anyhow, this should be reproducible with a classic IPv6 IPsec over
> IPv4 test.  Please make sure
> that the IPv4 interface doesn't have an IPv6 address set up.
> 
> Quoting from commit bc8e4b954e46 (xfrm6: ensure to use the same dev
> when building a bundle):
> 
> -       xdst->u.rt6.rt6i_idev = in6_dev_get(rt->u.dst.dev);
> +       xdst->u.rt6.rt6i_idev = in6_dev_get(dev);
> 
> dev points to IPv4 endpoint and if it doesn't have an IPv6 address
> associated then
> in6_dev_get(dev) will return NULL.

Hm, inet6_init() registers addrconf_notify() as a netdevice notifier
function. So addrconf_notify() is called whenever a netdevice is
registered. When looking at addrconf_notify(), there are only two
cases when the net_device has no inet6_dev assigned. This is either
on error, or if the device mtu is smaller than IPV6_MIN_MTU (i.e. 1280).

I can reproduce the behaviour you describe if I set the mtu of the
ipv4 device to a value below IPV6_MIN_MTU, but in no other case.

Is it possible that your ipv4 device has a mtu below IPV6_MIN_MTU?