From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] ARM: Push selects for TWD/SCU into machine entries Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 20:32:18 +0200 Message-ID: <201304092032.18885.arnd@arndb.de> References: <1362007694-3419-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> <5151DC41.7090307@codeaurora.org> <5164462E.4010706@codeaurora.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.186]:52728 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934538Ab3DIScs (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Apr 2013 14:32:48 -0400 In-Reply-To: <5164462E.4010706@codeaurora.org> Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Boyd Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Stephen Warren , Kukjin Kim , Russell King , Srinidhi Kasagar , Tony Lindgren , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Linus Walleij , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring , Sascha Hauer , Barry Song , Olof Johansson On Tuesday 09 April 2013, Stephen Boyd wrote: > >>> > >>> Sneaking it in through the fixes branch would make life easier for us, > >>> but it doesn't feel right. > >> Arnd, can you pick this up into the arm-soc tree now? It would be good > >> to get this into next so that conflicts are avoided later on. > >> > > Arnd? > > > > Ping? Sorry for the long delay, you scrolled down from my unread emails twice. Three tips for you to make it more likely to get a fast reaction time: * Send the original patch to Olof and me, not just the reply to the on-list patch. * Use the arm@kernel.org alias to reach us, since that will make the email go into the right folder * Use the [GIT PULL] keyword in the subject line, ideally sending a pull request as well, instead of a separate email. While we do apply emails, It's often batch processing to apply everything and then we scan for emails that have PULL in the subject, while others can get lost. I've applied it to the next/soc branch now. Arnd From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann) Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 20:32:18 +0200 Subject: [PATCHv2] ARM: Push selects for TWD/SCU into machine entries In-Reply-To: <5164462E.4010706@codeaurora.org> References: <1362007694-3419-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> <5151DC41.7090307@codeaurora.org> <5164462E.4010706@codeaurora.org> Message-ID: <201304092032.18885.arnd@arndb.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tuesday 09 April 2013, Stephen Boyd wrote: > >>> > >>> Sneaking it in through the fixes branch would make life easier for us, > >>> but it doesn't feel right. > >> Arnd, can you pick this up into the arm-soc tree now? It would be good > >> to get this into next so that conflicts are avoided later on. > >> > > Arnd? > > > > Ping? Sorry for the long delay, you scrolled down from my unread emails twice. Three tips for you to make it more likely to get a fast reaction time: * Send the original patch to Olof and me, not just the reply to the on-list patch. * Use the arm at kernel.org alias to reach us, since that will make the email go into the right folder * Use the [GIT PULL] keyword in the subject line, ideally sending a pull request as well, instead of a separate email. While we do apply emails, It's often batch processing to apply everything and then we scan for emails that have PULL in the subject, while others can get lost. I've applied it to the next/soc branch now. Arnd