From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: FAILED: Patch Upstream: Revert "PCI/ACPI: Request _OSC control before scanning PCI root bus"
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 09:11:33 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130410151133.GA4534@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130409220525.GC6877@kroah.com>
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 03:05:25PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> I tried to apply the patch below to the 3.8-stable tree, but it has
> conflicts and doesn't apply. So I tried a straight-revert of
> 8c33f51df406e1a1f7fa4e9b244845b7ebd61fa6, which did work fine, but I
> noticed that it really doesn't look anything like the patch below.
>
> Is this patch a "logical" revert, and not a "literal" one?
>
> Anyway, can someone send me a properly backported version so it can be
> applied to the 3.8-stable tree?
Here's a literal revert for v3.8.
commit 59bf5ae30b63368cca7f1c16d1ecfeed37fd128e
Author: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Date: Tue Apr 9 16:22:21 2013 -0600
Revert "PCI/ACPI: Request _OSC control before scanning PCI root bus"
This reverts commit 8c33f51df406e1a1f7fa4e9b244845b7ebd61fa6.
This commit broke some pre-1.1 PCIe devices by leaving them with
ASPM enabled. Previously, we had disabled ASPM on these devices
because many of them don't implement it correctly (per 149e1637).
Requesting _OSC control early means that aspm_disabled may be set
before we scan the PCI bus and configure link ASPM state. But the
ASPM configuration currently skips the check for pre-PCIe 1.1 devices
when aspm_disabled is set, like this:
acpi_pci_root_add
acpi_pci_osc_support
if (flags != base_flags)
pcie_no_aspm
aspm_disabled = 1
pci_acpi_scan_root
...
pcie_aspm_init_link_state
pcie_aspm_sanity_check
if (!aspm_disabled)
/* check for pre-PCIe 1.1 device */
Therefore, setting aspm_disabled early means that we leave ASPM enabled
on these pre-PCIe 1.1 devices, which is a regression for some devices.
The best fix would be to clean up the ASPM init so we can evaluate
_OSC before scanning the bug (that way boot-time and hot-add discovery
will work the same), but that requires significant rework.
For now, we'll just revert the _OSC change as the lowest-risk fix.
Reference: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55211
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
index 7928d4d..eb73798 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
@@ -454,7 +454,6 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device)
acpi_handle handle;
struct acpi_device *child;
u32 flags, base_flags;
- bool is_osc_granted = false;
root = kzalloc(sizeof(struct acpi_pci_root), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!root)
@@ -525,60 +524,6 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device)
flags = base_flags = OSC_PCI_SEGMENT_GROUPS_SUPPORT;
acpi_pci_osc_support(root, flags);
- /* Indicate support for various _OSC capabilities. */
- if (pci_ext_cfg_avail())
- flags |= OSC_EXT_PCI_CONFIG_SUPPORT;
- if (pcie_aspm_support_enabled()) {
- flags |= OSC_ACTIVE_STATE_PWR_SUPPORT |
- OSC_CLOCK_PWR_CAPABILITY_SUPPORT;
- }
- if (pci_msi_enabled())
- flags |= OSC_MSI_SUPPORT;
- if (flags != base_flags) {
- status = acpi_pci_osc_support(root, flags);
- if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
- dev_info(&device->dev, "ACPI _OSC support "
- "notification failed, disabling PCIe ASPM\n");
- pcie_no_aspm();
- flags = base_flags;
- }
- }
- if (!pcie_ports_disabled
- && (flags & ACPI_PCIE_REQ_SUPPORT) == ACPI_PCIE_REQ_SUPPORT) {
- flags = OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_CAP_STRUCTURE_CONTROL
- | OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_NATIVE_HP_CONTROL
- | OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_PME_CONTROL;
-
- if (pci_aer_available()) {
- if (aer_acpi_firmware_first())
- dev_dbg(&device->dev,
- "PCIe errors handled by BIOS.\n");
- else
- flags |= OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_AER_CONTROL;
- }
-
- dev_info(&device->dev,
- "Requesting ACPI _OSC control (0x%02x)\n", flags);
-
- status = acpi_pci_osc_control_set(device->handle, &flags,
- OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_CAP_STRUCTURE_CONTROL);
- if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) {
- is_osc_granted = true;
- dev_info(&device->dev,
- "ACPI _OSC control (0x%02x) granted\n", flags);
- } else {
- is_osc_granted = false;
- dev_info(&device->dev,
- "ACPI _OSC request failed (%s), "
- "returned control mask: 0x%02x\n",
- acpi_format_exception(status), flags);
- }
- } else {
- dev_info(&device->dev,
- "Unable to request _OSC control "
- "(_OSC support mask: 0x%02x)\n", flags);
- }
-
/*
* TBD: Need PCI interface for enumeration/configuration of roots.
*/
@@ -618,14 +563,66 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device)
list_for_each_entry(child, &device->children, node)
acpi_pci_bridge_scan(child);
- /* ASPM setting */
- if (is_osc_granted) {
- if (acpi_gbl_FADT.boot_flags & ACPI_FADT_NO_ASPM)
- pcie_clear_aspm(root->bus);
+ /* Indicate support for various _OSC capabilities. */
+ if (pci_ext_cfg_avail())
+ flags |= OSC_EXT_PCI_CONFIG_SUPPORT;
+ if (pcie_aspm_support_enabled())
+ flags |= OSC_ACTIVE_STATE_PWR_SUPPORT |
+ OSC_CLOCK_PWR_CAPABILITY_SUPPORT;
+ if (pci_msi_enabled())
+ flags |= OSC_MSI_SUPPORT;
+ if (flags != base_flags) {
+ status = acpi_pci_osc_support(root, flags);
+ if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
+ dev_info(root->bus->bridge, "ACPI _OSC support "
+ "notification failed, disabling PCIe ASPM\n");
+ pcie_no_aspm();
+ flags = base_flags;
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (!pcie_ports_disabled
+ && (flags & ACPI_PCIE_REQ_SUPPORT) == ACPI_PCIE_REQ_SUPPORT) {
+ flags = OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_CAP_STRUCTURE_CONTROL
+ | OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_NATIVE_HP_CONTROL
+ | OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_PME_CONTROL;
+
+ if (pci_aer_available()) {
+ if (aer_acpi_firmware_first())
+ dev_dbg(root->bus->bridge,
+ "PCIe errors handled by BIOS.\n");
+ else
+ flags |= OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_AER_CONTROL;
+ }
+
+ dev_info(root->bus->bridge,
+ "Requesting ACPI _OSC control (0x%02x)\n", flags);
+
+ status = acpi_pci_osc_control_set(device->handle, &flags,
+ OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_CAP_STRUCTURE_CONTROL);
+ if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) {
+ dev_info(root->bus->bridge,
+ "ACPI _OSC control (0x%02x) granted\n", flags);
+ if (acpi_gbl_FADT.boot_flags & ACPI_FADT_NO_ASPM) {
+ /*
+ * We have ASPM control, but the FADT indicates
+ * that it's unsupported. Clear it.
+ */
+ pcie_clear_aspm(root->bus);
+ }
+ } else {
+ dev_info(root->bus->bridge,
+ "ACPI _OSC request failed (%s), "
+ "returned control mask: 0x%02x\n",
+ acpi_format_exception(status), flags);
+ pr_info("ACPI _OSC control for PCIe not granted, "
+ "disabling ASPM\n");
+ pcie_no_aspm();
+ }
} else {
- pr_info("ACPI _OSC control for PCIe not granted, "
- "disabling ASPM\n");
- pcie_no_aspm();
+ dev_info(root->bus->bridge,
+ "Unable to request _OSC control "
+ "(_OSC support mask: 0x%02x)\n", flags);
}
pci_acpi_add_bus_pm_notifier(device, root->bus);
next parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-10 15:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20130406030022.8D4132A64@git.kroah.org>
[not found] ` <20130409220525.GC6877@kroah.com>
2013-04-10 15:11 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2013-04-10 20:18 ` FAILED: Patch Upstream: Revert "PCI/ACPI: Request _OSC control before scanning PCI root bus" Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130410151133.GA4534@google.com \
--to=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.