From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp2-g21.free.fr (smtp2-g21.free.fr [212.27.42.2]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77254E014E9 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 06:39:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e6520eb (pac33-2-82-240-38-71.fbx.proxad.net [82.240.38.71]) (Authenticated sender: eukrea) by smtp2-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D50364B00DB; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 15:38:55 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 15:38:54 +0200 From: Eric =?UTF-8?B?QsOpbmFyZA==?= To: Otavio Salvador Message-ID: <20130410153854.0ec16740@e6520eb> In-Reply-To: References: <1365535321-27350-1-git-send-email-otavio@ossystems.com.br> <1365535321-27350-8-git-send-email-otavio@ossystems.com.br> <5164D31A.7030108@gmail.com> <20130410141524.334be50f@e6520eb> <20130410150644.72e8765c@e6520eb> Organization: =?UTF-8?B?RXVrcsOpYQ==?= Electromatique X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.13; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: meta-freescale Mailing List Subject: Re: [meta-fsl-arm-extra][PATCH v2 6/8] u-boot-imx: Remove Wandboard patch as it is not supported by mainline X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 13:39:06 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Otavio, Le Wed, 10 Apr 2013 10:26:38 -0300, Otavio Salvador a =C3=A9crit : > On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Fabio Estevam wrot= e: > > On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 10:20 AM, John Weber wro= te: > >> I don't have a problem with removing the old code. Just that we need t= o do > >> it in phases. Phase 1 is to add new code. Test that. Then get rid of = the > >> old code. If we do it all at once then I can't make a simple configur= ation > >> change and compare code bases. > > > > Right, maybe what we can do is to keep the Wandboard U-boot 2009.08 > > support and let u-boot 2013.04 be the default one. > > > > This would help us to see if we have issues with the new code and > > compare the behavior with the old one. >=20 > This is what I did for now. >=20 You sent theses patches yesterday on the ML and now while I was going to test them I see they are already committed on the git repository : I won't continue to loose more time to test/review your patches as in fact you don't allow any review since you are pushing your patches so fast to master. Best regards, Eric