From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pa0-f43.google.com ([209.85.220.43]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UPxRw-0006kh-Lp for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 18:00:41 +0200 Received: by mail-pa0-f43.google.com with SMTP id hz11so385425pad.30 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 08:43:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=nl+rMOPbLnQS3riqKXj/qGPf58JlZbfl1u7/uCp6R+4=; b=OTca/2K5PGXSb0eZnp/9jFAnxqyLPyNU12Ie7Z0dNWus/oNUXcX1MdDNzbOUIGZdux f0jBIvkWvx4URo5+Iy2RGRlSxo5Q5myt3WXfu9dhRg6lvVWKSACSkJRK+hHZgTf/a3s2 p2YI+taIyLkjrYNs1kvdjuRCRPvp0+FVm3I4kR+BtMnNQJ0Q+m3pjy0cMc+bmaMJHpBd NXjpqZGGmvSkXJgeRgPKL0DYypDOlGzz4ic7ylaoy64odJwp/Y7S9luKlRYuwMsUXai6 gN6EFAnyoTFWIVOjEddLUqv4X5sQZ/EIAX5cky0QaC2+OiotaHywGgAQxRHcp3lH8Qfp cFmw== X-Received: by 10.68.212.100 with SMTP id nj4mr3707731pbc.84.1365608598398; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 08:43:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (ip-62-24-80-7.net.upcbroadband.cz. [62.24.80.7]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ef3sm882928pad.20.2013.04.10.08.43.15 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 10 Apr 2013 08:43:17 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 17:43:10 +0200 From: Martin Jansa To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-ID: <20130410154310.GD2471@jama> References: <1365604639-5235-1-git-send-email-ndec@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: Re: [meta-multimedia][PATCH] gupnp: remove dependency on gnome-icon-theme X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 16:00:48 -0000 X-Groupsio-MsgNum: 44026 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="2Z2K0IlrPCVsbNpk" Content-Disposition: inline --2Z2K0IlrPCVsbNpk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 04:37:11PM +0100, Burton, Ross wrote: > Hi Nicolas, >=20 > On 10 April 2013 16:14, Nicolas Dechesne wrote: > > then, what I could do is a patch serie where patch 1/2 introduces the > > INC_PR with "r0", and patch 2/2 fixes gupnp and increments INC_PR to > > 'r1'. >=20 > Exactly that. >=20 > > also, is that worthwhile to add the INC_PR in all other recipes in the > > gupnp folder ? or just in gupnp recipe for now? >=20 > Do them all, might as well. Is it important now, when PR bumps are not strictly required? There were more dangerous changes without PR bumps included in last months. --=20 Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com --2Z2K0IlrPCVsbNpk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlFliI4ACgkQN1Ujt2V2gBxJ7wCbBVCsQkFzEyle8ALOaVsbgJpj VG4AoIpBlpXwJPOrpz/540K8Wtl8qoMt =D24R -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --2Z2K0IlrPCVsbNpk--