From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: plagnioj@jcrosoft.com (Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD) Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:44:25 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: at91: move dts to subdir In-Reply-To: <5165A3BE.4070001@wwwdotorg.org> References: <1365585444-11520-1-git-send-email-plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> <1365585444-11520-2-git-send-email-plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> <5165A3BE.4070001@wwwdotorg.org> Message-ID: <20130410174425.GA20693@game.jcrosoft.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 11:39 Wed 10 Apr , Stephen Warren wrote: > On 04/10/2013 03:17 AM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD > > A patch description might be nice. > > This seems like a nice cleanup to keep the dts directory organized. yeah I was really not a fan on the prefix stuff > However, it does mean that the *.dtb files get moved again. I know that > when they moved from boot/ to boot/dts/ in 3.9 (or 3.8?) there were some > complaints that this made it difficult to write scripts that find the > built DTB and copy it somewhere. This change would cause the exact same > problem again. yes this will move the dtb location to the subdir > > Perhaps it's time to create an install_dtbs target to solve this problem? I think about it too but was not sure if it will be usefull as you may end with all the mach-xxx dtb generated and on embedded system you do not want all of them on contrary on Ubuntu & co I was also think to make it more generic so move the code to Kbuild so any arch can use it