From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pd0-f180.google.com ([209.85.192.180]:57800 "EHLO mail-pd0-f180.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S936455Ab3DJUSD (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Apr 2013 16:18:03 -0400 Received: by mail-pd0-f180.google.com with SMTP id q11so457849pdj.11 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 13:18:03 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 13:18:00 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Bjorn Helgaas Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Yinghai Lu , stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: FAILED: Patch Upstream: Revert "PCI/ACPI: Request _OSC control before scanning PCI root bus" Message-ID: <20130410201800.GB7125@kroah.com> References: <20130406030022.8D4132A64@git.kroah.org> <20130409220525.GC6877@kroah.com> <20130410151133.GA4534@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20130410151133.GA4534@google.com> Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 09:11:33AM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 03:05:25PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > I tried to apply the patch below to the 3.8-stable tree, but it has > > conflicts and doesn't apply. So I tried a straight-revert of > > 8c33f51df406e1a1f7fa4e9b244845b7ebd61fa6, which did work fine, but I > > noticed that it really doesn't look anything like the patch below. > > > > Is this patch a "logical" revert, and not a "literal" one? > > > > Anyway, can someone send me a properly backported version so it can be > > applied to the 3.8-stable tree? > > Here's a literal revert for v3.8. Thanks, applied. greg k-h