From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: 4430sdp nfsroot broken with ff5c9059 Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 15:27:50 -0700 Message-ID: <20130410222749.GR10155@atomide.com> References: <20130409212318.GR10155@atomide.com> <5165A1DB.3020404@ti.com> <20130410182034.GH10155@atomide.com> <5165CED4.1040800@ti.com> <20130410205407.GQ10155@atomide.com> <5165E6F1.8040102@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mho-03-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.66]:65503 "EHLO mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1762521Ab3DJW1w (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Apr 2013 18:27:52 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5165E6F1.8040102@ti.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Jon Hunter Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, "Cousson, Benoit" * Jon Hunter [130410 15:30]: > > Are you saying that you want to use the version with that is using the > pre-processor definitions? I was thinking that may be we could do that > as a clean-up for v3.11 and just use the original version I posted > earlier. Seems cleaner to me. No let's do that the preprocessor conversion for v3.11. > > Also, is there need to back port these two patches to v3.9-rc? > > If nobody has noticed, I guess not? > > This should only be applicable to v3.10 so no need to backport. Or are > you saying that you are seeing this with v3.9 also? That would be odd. Not seeing it in v3.9, but I was wondering if it's lurking there too in some format. But I guess not. Regards, Tony