From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: 3.9-rc5: Encountedred INFO: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU due to 09a9f1d27
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 14:13:48 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130412181348.GA2253@redhat.com> (raw)
Hi,
I am writing some code where I lock down a process memory at exec() time.
My patches were working fine till 3.9-rc4 and suddendly things broke down
in 3.9-rc5.
Whenever I tried to exec() a process with memory locked down, my bash
session hangs and after a while I get following warning.
login: [ 174.669002] INFO: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU { 2} (t=60000 jiffies g=2580 c=2579 q=1085)
[ 174.669002] Pid: 4894, comm: kexec Not tainted 3.9.0-rc6+ #243
[ 174.669002] Call Trace:
[ 174.669002] <IRQ> [<ffffffff810c413a>] rcu_check_callbacks+0x21a/0x760
[ 174.669002] [<ffffffff810c7c0c>] ? acct_account_cputime+0x1c/0x20
[ 174.669002] [<ffffffff8104fd08>] update_process_times+0x48/0x80
[ 174.669002] [<ffffffff810913dd>] tick_sched_handle+0x3d/0x50
[ 174.669002] [<ffffffff810915e5>] tick_sched_timer+0x45/0x70
[ 174.669002] [<ffffffff81066951>] __run_hrtimer+0x81/0x220
[ 174.669002] [<ffffffff810915a0>] ? tick_nohz_handler+0xa0/0xa0
[ 174.669002] [<ffffffff8108ae0c>] ? ktime_get_update_offsets+0x4c/0xd0
[ 174.669002] [<ffffffff81067297>] hrtimer_interrupt+0xf7/0x250
[ 174.669002] [<ffffffff81886739>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x69/0x99
[ 174.669002] [<ffffffff818859ca>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x6a/0x70
[ 174.669002] <EOI> [<ffffffff8111e557>] ? __mlock_vma_pages_range+0x57/0x70
[ 174.669002] [<ffffffff8111e568>] ? __mlock_vma_pages_range+0x68/0x70
[ 174.669002] [<ffffffff8111ea01>] __mm_populate+0x71/0x140
[ 174.669002] [<ffffffff81121b5f>] vm_brk+0x7f/0xa0
[ 174.669002] [<ffffffff81199633>] load_elf_binary+0x1a73/0x1b10
[ 174.669002] [<ffffffff812d25a5>] ? ima_bprm_check+0x55/0x70
[ 174.669002] [<ffffffff8114890a>] search_binary_handler+0x12a/0x3b0
[ 174.669002] [<ffffffff81197bc0>] ? load_elf_library+0x210/0x210
[ 174.669002] [<ffffffff8114aa00>] do_execve_common+0x500/0x5c0
[ 174.669002] [<ffffffff8114aaf7>] do_execve+0x37/0x40
[ 174.669002] [<ffffffff8114ad9d>] sys_execve+0x3d/0x60
[ 174.669002] [<ffffffff81885379>] stub_execve+0x69/0xa0
I did a git bisect and bisection says that following is first bad
commit.
commit 09a9f1d27892255cfb9c91203f19476765e2d8d1
Author: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
Date: Thu Mar 28 16:26:23 2013 -0700
Revert "mm: introduce VM_POPULATE flag to better deal with racy userspace pr
This reverts commit 186930500985 ("mm: introduce VM_POPULATE flag to
better deal with racy userspace programs").
I reverted above commit and problem gets fixed.
Following is my simple patch to lock down a selected process memory.
Index: linux-2.6/fs/binfmt_elf.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/fs/binfmt_elf.c 2013-04-13 01:50:26.380184101
-0400
+++ linux-2.6/fs/binfmt_elf.c 2013-04-13 01:50:49.827184821 -0400
@@ -721,6 +721,10 @@ static int load_elf_binary(struct linux_
/* OK, This is the point of no return */
current->mm->def_flags = def_flags;
+ if (!strcmp(bprm->filename, "/sbin/kexec")) {
+ printk("Memlocking /sbin/kexec\n");
+ current->mm->def_flags |= VM_LOCKED;
+ }
/* Do this immediately, since STACK_TOP as used in setup_arg_pages
may depend on the personality. */
Do you have any thoughts on what's going on. I am wondering if it indicates
a bigger problem which can then be triggered from other paths too.
Thanks
Vivek
next reply other threads:[~2013-04-12 18:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-12 18:13 Vivek Goyal [this message]
2013-04-13 2:12 ` 3.9-rc5: Encountedred INFO: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU due to 09a9f1d27 Michel Lespinasse
2013-04-13 2:31 ` Michel Lespinasse
2013-04-15 16:35 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-04-15 17:34 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-04-15 17:59 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-04-15 19:13 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-04-15 21:47 ` Hugh Dickins
2013-04-16 0:21 ` Michel Lespinasse
2013-04-16 1:27 ` Hugh Dickins
2013-04-29 8:57 ` Michel Lespinasse
2013-04-29 13:29 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-05-20 20:23 ` Vivek Goyal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130412181348.GA2253@redhat.com \
--to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=walken@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.