From: Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com>
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [meta-handheld] linux-yocto-3.8 failing
Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 16:54:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130414145452.GD2475@jama> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADkTA4OenBfydWeEEj6AaEOJMt7GEHbx8+FCSzs2mYRFx-MJxQ@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 7558 bytes --]
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 11:59:35PM -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 11:00 PM, Bruce Ashfield
> <bruce.ashfield@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 9:04 PM, Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 08:44:53PM -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 6:52 PM, Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> > Hi Andrea,
> >>> >
> >>> > patches from
> >>> > http://git.openembedded.org/meta-handheld/commit/?id=54c01286d738e6a6dc2971853644b9ed0e0a9a2e
> >>> >
> >>> > don't apply after linux-yocto upgrade in oe-core from today
> >>> > http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/?id=0271dec64591c4d91933b3a8db875a374a63640b
> >>>
> >>> Hmm. Andrea and I debugged another problem with these BSPs just yesterday,
> >>> I sent a fix to RP that is slightly newer than the commit you are referencing
> >>> above.
> >>>
> >>> If it still doesn't work with the very tip of oe-core, then I'll help
> >>> Andrea debug more ... unless
> >>> the patches really do need a refresh :)
> >>
> >> Maybe it was caused by some other linux-yocto/kern-tools-native change
> >> instead, because I've built linux-yocto-3.8 for spitz earlier today
> >> (with oe-core revision from yesterday). Then I upgraded oe-core again
> >> and it started to fail.
> >
> > There were some changes just this morning, to fix NFS root issues
> > picked up on the
> > h/w reference BSPS. Before that, some patches were being missed and not throwing
> > a hard error. They are likely found now .. and could be what is
> > causing the problem.
> >
> > The easiest way for me is to just clone and configure my own spitz
> > build and I'll
> > let everyone know how it goes.
>
> Just a follow up. I tested the build, and it is just a straight up
> patch refresh issue,
> everything is being properly queued. If it ever worked on the 3.8
> kernel, that was
> the anomaly not the current patch failure.
OK, thanks for looking into it. It seems that failing patch wasn't applied
at all before, reverting this commit
commit ddce9f375c626ef2c86f48612b3d7a24e3111b0b
Author: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>
Date: Fri Apr 12 02:16:33 2013 +0000
kern-tools: fix non-local patch/config location
allows to build it with spitz again, but I belive you it's just some
patch which is now applied but needs to be refreshed first.
Cheers,
> The first example of spitz_pm.patch failing is because the following mainline
> commit has already done the job:
>
> > git show 510fcb0d331f314cd20d0067d56f29302846f47b
> commit 510fcb0d331f314cd20d0067d56f29302846f47b
> Author: Marko Katic <dromede@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu Oct 25 18:51:38 2012 +0200
>
> ARM: pxa/spitz_pm: Fix hang when resuming from STR
>
> Devices that use spitz_pm.c will fail to resume
> from STR (Suspend To Ram) when the charger plug is inserted
> or removed when a device is in STR mode. The culprit is
> a misconfigured gpio line - GPIO18. GPIO18 should be configured as a
> regular GPIO input but it gets configured as an alternate function
> GPIO18_RDY. And then later in postsuspend() it gets configured as
> a regular GPIO18 input line.
>
> Fix this by removing the GPIO18_RDY configuration so that GPIO18
> only gets configured as a regular gpio input.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marko Katic <dromede@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@gmail.com>
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/spitz_pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/spitz_pm.c
>
> ... etc.
>
> So just the standard matter of refreshing and dropping some patches.
> Unless Andrea
> finds out that I'm just missing something in my config or test.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Bruce
>
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Bruce
> >
> >>
> >> https://github.com/shr-distribution/buildhistory/commit/0e3324cd91d06a362661b4151a298fa2f3f6566e
> >> is my last successful spitz image build and it shows
> >> kernel_3.8.4+git0+27b63fdbd25ad1a37bacc05f49a205c150d21779_11998bd1f44b21cd0b8c0ca11cbd36865f14bfdc-r4.0.0_spitz.ipk
> >> (same SRCREVs as now failing build)
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >>
> >>> > ERROR: Function failed: do_patch (see /OE/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/work/spitz-oe-linux-gnueabi/linux-yocto/3.8.4+gitAUTOINC+27b63fdbd25ad1a37bacc05f49a205c150d21779_11998bd1f44b21cd0b8c0ca11cbd36865f14bfdc-r4.1/temp/log.do_patch.18051 for further information)
> >>> > ERROR: Logfile of failure stored in: /OE/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/work/spitz-oe-linux-gnueabi/linux-yocto/3.8.4+gitAUTOINC+27b63fdbd25ad1a37bacc05f49a205c150d21779_11998bd1f44b21cd0b8c0ca11cbd36865f14bfdc-r4.1/temp/log.do_patch.18051
> >>> > Log data follows:
> >>> > | DEBUG: Executing shell function do_patch
> >>> > | Deleted branch meta-temp (was 37fdb0c).
> >>> > | [INFO] validating against known patches (spitz-standard-meta)
> >>> > error: patch failed: arch/arm/mach-pxa/spitz_pm.c:86##] (\)(102 %)
> >>> > | error: arch/arm/mach-pxa/spitz_pm.c: patch does not apply
> >>> > | To force apply this patch, use 'guilt push -f'
> >>> > | [ERROR] unable to complete push
> >>> > | pending patches are:
> >>> > | links/linux-yocto-3.8/spitz_pm.patch
> >>> > | links/linux-yocto-3.8/pxa27x-sa1100-rtc.patch
> >>> > | links/linux-yocto-3.8/spi-pxa2xx-fix-mem.patch
> >>> > | ERROR. could not update git tree
> >>> > | ERROR. Could not apply patches for spitz.
> >>> > | Patch failures can be resolved in the devshell (bitbake -c devshell linux-yocto)
> >>> > | ERROR: Function failed: do_patch (see /OE/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/work/spitz-oe-linux-gnueabi/linux-yocto/3.8.4+gitAUTOINC+27b63fdbd25ad1a37bacc05f49a205c150d21779_11998bd1f44b21cd0b8c0ca11cbd36865f14bfdc-r4.1/temp/log.do_patch.18051 for further information)
> >>> > ERROR: Task 3 (/OE/shr-core/openembedded-core/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_3.8.bb, do_patch) failed with exit code '1'
> >>> > NOTE: Tasks Summary: Attempted 26 tasks of which 21 didn't need to be rerun and 1 failed.
> >>> >
> >>> > --
> >>> > Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com
> >>> >
> >>> > _______________________________________________
> >>> > Openembedded-devel mailing list
> >>> > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> >>> > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> "Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await
> >>> thee at its end"
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> >>> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> >>> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
> >>
> >> --
> >> Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> >> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> >> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > "Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await
> > thee at its end"
>
>
>
> --
> "Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await
> thee at its end"
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
--
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 205 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-14 15:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-12 22:52 [meta-handheld] linux-yocto-3.8 failing Martin Jansa
2013-04-13 0:44 ` Bruce Ashfield
2013-04-13 1:04 ` Martin Jansa
2013-04-13 3:00 ` Bruce Ashfield
2013-04-13 3:59 ` Bruce Ashfield
2013-04-14 14:54 ` Martin Jansa [this message]
2013-04-14 15:35 ` Bruce Ashfield
2013-04-14 16:03 ` Andrea Adami
2013-04-14 16:29 ` Bruce Ashfield
2013-04-15 9:15 ` Andrea Adami
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130414145452.GD2475@jama \
--to=martin.jansa@gmail.com \
--cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.