Re: [PATCH 09/17] Bluetooth: Update le_scan_disable_work to use HCI request

[Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@gmail.com>]

Hi Andre, 

On Thu, Apr 04, 2013, Andre Guedes wrote:
> +static void le_scan_disable_work_complete(struct hci_dev *hdev, u8 status)
> +{
> +	struct hci_command_hdr *last_cmd;
> +	u16 opcode;
> +
> +	BT_DBG("status %d", status);
> +
> +	/* Get opcode from the last command sent */
> +	last_cmd = (void *) hdev->sent_cmd->data;
> +	opcode = __le16_to_cpu(last_cmd->opcode);
> +
> +	switch (opcode) {
> +	case HCI_OP_LE_SET_SCAN_ENABLE:
> +		if (status) {
> +			BT_ERR("Failed to disable LE scanning: status %d",
> +			       status);
> +			return;
> +		}
> +
> +		hci_dev_lock(hdev);
> +		hci_discovery_set_state(hdev, DISCOVERY_STOPPED);
> +		hci_dev_unlock(hdev);
> +		break;
> +
> +	case HCI_OP_INQUIRY:
> +		if (status) {
> +			hci_dev_lock(hdev);
> +			hci_discovery_set_state(hdev, DISCOVERY_STOPPED);
> +			hci_dev_unlock(hdev);
> +			return;
> +		}
> +
> +		break;
> +	}
> +}
> +
>  static void le_scan_disable_work(struct work_struct *work)
>  {
>  	struct hci_dev *hdev = container_of(work, struct hci_dev,
>  					    le_scan_disable.work);
>  	struct hci_cp_le_set_scan_enable cp;
> +	struct hci_request req;
> +	int err;
>  
>  	BT_DBG("%s", hdev->name);
>  
> +	if (hdev->discovery.state != DISCOVERY_FINDING)
> +		return;
> +
> +	hci_req_init(&req, hdev);
> +
>  	memset(&cp, 0, sizeof(cp));
> +	cp.enable = LE_SCAN_DISABLE;
> +	hci_req_add(&req, HCI_OP_LE_SET_SCAN_ENABLE, sizeof(cp), &cp);
> +
> +	/* If we are running the interleaved discovery, also add the inquiry
> +	 * HCI command to the HCI request.
> +	 */
> +	if (hdev->discovery.type == DISCOV_TYPE_INTERLEAVED) {
> +		struct hci_cp_inquiry inq_cp;
> +		/* General inquiry access code (GIAC) */
> +		u8 lap[3] = { 0x33, 0x8b, 0x9e };
> +
> +		hci_dev_lock(hdev);
> +		inquiry_cache_flush(hdev);
> +		hci_dev_unlock(hdev);
> +
> +		memset(&inq_cp, 0, sizeof(inq_cp));
> +		memcpy(&inq_cp.lap, lap, sizeof(inq_cp.lap));
> +		inq_cp.length = DISCOV_INTERLEAVED_INQUIRY_LEN;
> +		hci_req_add(&req, HCI_OP_INQUIRY, sizeof(inq_cp), &inq_cp);
> +	}
>  
> -	hci_send_cmd(hdev, HCI_OP_LE_SET_SCAN_ENABLE, sizeof(cp), &cp);
> +	err = hci_req_run(&req, le_scan_disable_work_complete);
> +	if (err)
> +		BT_ERR("Failed to disable LE scanning: err %d", err);
>  }

I don't really like the complexity of the logic here with having to peek
at hdev->sent_cmd to figure out what's going on in the callback. Maybe
instead do this in two separate steps, i.e. send the HCI_OP_INQUIRY only
in the callback for the HCI_OP_LE_SET_SCAN_ENABLE. Alternatively look
into the possibility of using our recently introduced _sync API, though
you'll first need to have a patch to add a hci_cmd_sync() which
internally acquires the request lock.

Johan