From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
To: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL FOR v3.10] Camera sensors patches
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 11:36:39 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130417113639.1c98f574@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130417135503.GL13687@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Em Wed, 17 Apr 2013 14:55:03 +0100
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> escreveu:
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 08:04:52PM +0200, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
>
> > It's probably more clean to provide a dummy clock/regulator in a host driver
> > (platform) than to add something in a sub-device drivers that would resolve
> > which resources should be requested and which not.
>
> Yes, that's the general theory for regulators at least - it allows the
> device driver to just trundle along and not worry about how the board is
> hooked up. The other issue it resolves that you didn't mention is that
> it avoids just ignoring errors which isn't terribly clever.
I agree. Adding dummy clock/regulator at the host platform driver makes
sense, as the platform driver knows how the board is hooked up; keeping
it at the I2C driver doesn't make sense, so the code needs to be moved
away from it.
Laurent,
Could you please work on a patch moving that code to the host platform
driver?
Thanks!
Mauro
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-17 14:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-12 9:13 [GIT PULL FOR v3.10] Camera sensors patches Laurent Pinchart
2013-04-14 19:59 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2013-04-15 10:19 ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-04-15 12:42 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2013-04-16 15:30 ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-04-16 17:36 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2013-04-16 18:04 ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2013-04-17 13:55 ` Mark Brown
2013-04-17 14:36 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab [this message]
2013-04-21 23:14 ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-04-22 10:03 ` Mark Brown
2013-04-22 12:46 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2013-04-22 12:56 ` Mark Brown
2013-04-22 12:46 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130417113639.1c98f574@redhat.com \
--to=mchehab@redhat.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mturquette@linaro.org \
--cc=s.nawrocki@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.