From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@mellanox.com>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Roland Dreier <roland@kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, Yan Burman <yanb@mellanox.com>,
Jack Morgenstein <jackm@dev.mellanox.co.il>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH repost for-3.9] pci: avoid work_on_cpu for nested SRIOV probes
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 11:33:47 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130418083347.GA16526@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130414134339.GA3050@htj.dyndns.org>
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 06:43:39AM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 03:58:55PM +0300, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> > So the patch eliminated the lockdep warning for mlx4 nested probing
> > sequence, but introduced lockdep warning for
> > 00:13.0 PIC: Intel Corporation 7500/5520/5500/X58 I/O Hub I/OxAPIC
> > Interrupt Controller (rev 22)
>
> Oops, the patch in itself doesn't really change anything. The caller
> should use a different subclass for the nested invocation, just like
> spin_lock_nested() and friends. Sorry about not being clear.
> Michael, can you please help?
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> tejun
So like this on top. Tejun, you didn't add your S.O.B and patch
description, if this helps as we expect they will be needed.
---->
pci: use work_on_cpu_nested for nested SRIOV
Snce 3.9-rc1 mlx driver started triggering a lockdep warning.
The issue is that a driver, in it's probe function, calls
pci_sriov_enable so a PF device probe causes VF probe (AKA nested
probe). Each probe in pci_device_probe which is (normally) run through
work_on_cpu (this is to get the right numa node for memory allocated by
the driver). In turn work_on_cpu does this internally:
schedule_work_on(cpu, &wfc.work);
flush_work(&wfc.work);
So if you are running probe on CPU1, and cause another
probe on the same CPU, this will try to flush
workqueue from inside same workqueue which triggers
a lockdep warning.
Nested probing might be tricky to get right generally.
But for pci_sriov_enable, the situation is actually very simple:
VFs almost never use the same driver as the PF so the warning
is bogus there.
This is hardly elegant as it might shut up some real warnings if a buggy
driver actually probes itself in a nested way, but looks to me like an
appropriate quick fix for 3.9.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
---
diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c b/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
index 1fa1e48..9c836ef 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
@@ -286,9 +286,9 @@ static int pci_call_probe(struct pci_driver *drv, struct pci_dev *dev,
int cpu;
get_online_cpus();
- cpu = cpumask_any_and(cpumask_of_node(node), cpu_online_mask);
- if (cpu < nr_cpu_ids)
- error = work_on_cpu(cpu, local_pci_probe, &ddi);
+ cpu = cpumask_first_and(cpumask_of_node(node), cpu_online_mask);
+ if (cpu != raw_smp_processor_id() && cpu < nr_cpu_ids)
+ error = work_on_cpu_nested(cpu, local_pci_probe, &ddi);
else
error = local_pci_probe(&ddi);
put_online_cpus();
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-18 9:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-11 15:30 [PATCH repost for-3.9] pci: avoid work_on_cpu for nested SRIOV probes Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-04-11 18:05 ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-11 18:58 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-04-11 19:04 ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-11 19:17 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-04-11 19:20 ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-11 20:30 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-04-11 20:41 ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-11 21:52 ` Or Gerlitz
2013-04-14 12:58 ` Or Gerlitz
2013-04-14 13:43 ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-18 8:33 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2013-04-18 9:40 ` Jack Morgenstein
2013-04-18 8:48 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-04-18 9:57 ` Jack Morgenstein
2013-04-18 14:49 ` Or Gerlitz
2013-04-18 13:54 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-04-18 18:19 ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-18 18:25 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-04-18 20:11 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-04-18 18:41 ` Or Gerlitz
2013-04-18 20:03 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130418083347.GA16526@redhat.com \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jackm@dev.mellanox.co.il \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@canonical.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ogerlitz@mellanox.com \
--cc=roland@kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=yanb@mellanox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.