From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
yrl.pp-manager.tt@hitachi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip ] [BUGFIX] kprobes: Fix a double lock bug of kprobe_mutex
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 09:25:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130419072500.GA21866@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130419072250.GA20897@gmail.com>
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> * Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 06:33:18PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > > Fix a double locking bug caused when debug.kprobe-optimization=0.
> > > While the proc_kprobes_optimization_handler locks kprobe_mutex,
> > > wait_for_kprobe_optimizer locks it again and that causes a double lock.
> > > To fix the bug, this introduces different mutex for protecting
> > > sysctl parameter and locks it in proc_kprobes_optimization_handler.
> > > Of course, since we need to lock kprobe_mutex when touching kprobes
> > > resources, that is done in *optimize_all_kprobes().
> > >
> > > This bug was from ad72b3bea744b4db01c89af0f86f3e8920d354df
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
> > > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> > > Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> > > Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>
> > > Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
> >
> > Oops,
> >
> > Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
>
> Since you pushed the original commit, mind pushing this fix to Linus too?
I see Linus applied it out of email, so never mind.
Thanks,
Ingo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-19 7:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-18 9:33 [PATCH -tip ] [BUGFIX] kprobes: Fix a double lock bug of kprobe_mutex Masami Hiramatsu
2013-04-18 15:49 ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2013-04-18 18:17 ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-19 7:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-04-19 7:25 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130419072500.GA21866@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=yrl.pp-manager.tt@hitachi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.