From: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 6/6] arm: mx5: Add support for DENX M53EVK
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 13:58:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201304191358.25181.marex@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130419055211.8EB56200566@gemini.denx.de>
Dear Wolfgang Denk,
> Dear Marek Vasut,
>
> In message <1366344655-8535-6-git-send-email-marex@denx.de> you wrote:
> ...
>
> > +#define CONFIG_CMD_DHCP
> > +#define CONFIG_CMD_EXT2
> > +#define CONFIG_CMD_FAT
> > +#define CONFIG_CMD_FAT
>
> One CONFIG_CMD_FAT should be enough.
Indeed, it might be too fat now.
[...]
>
> > +#define CONFIG_CMDLINE_TAG
> > +#define CONFIG_INITRD_TAG
> > +#define CONFIG_SETUP_MEMORY_TAGS
>
> I think we support only DT enabled kernels, so do we really need
> these?
I do need those to boot ancient FSL kernel (for that Android 4.1.2 for MX53 with
working graphics acceleration I'm cooking here).
> > +#define CONFIG_BOOTFILE "uImage"
>
> Please make this "m53evk/uImage" as usual.
>
> Don't we need a DT file as well?
OK
> > +#define CONFIG_BOOTARGS "console=ttymxc1,115200"
> > +#define CONFIG_BOOTCOMMAND "run bootcmd_net"
>
> Where is "bootcmd_net" defined?
>
> I doubt that this is actually a working environment.
Right.
> > +#define CONFIG_LOADADDR 0x70800000
> > +#define CONFIG_SYS_LOAD_ADDR CONFIG_LOADADDR
>
> What do we need CONFIG_LOADADDR for?
For this stuff, the "loadaddr" env variable. I have kinda idea to kill this and
unify it to CONFIG_SYS_LOAD_ADDR all around, what do you think?
include/env_default.h:#ifdef CONFIG_LOADADDR
include/env_default.h: "loadaddr=" __stringify(CONFIG_LOADADDR) "\0"
> > +/*
> > + * The 0x1000 offset must be present, otherwise board won't boot.
> > + * The value (IRAM_BASE_ADDR) must be spelled out, otherwise linker
> > won't link. + */
> > +#define CONFIG_SPL_TEXT_BASE 0x70008000
> > +#define CONFIG_SPL_PAD_TO 0x8000
> > +#define CONFIG_SPL_STACK 0x70004000
> > +#define CONFIG_SPL_LIBCOMMON_SUPPORT
> > +#define CONFIG_SPL_LIBGENERIC_SUPPORT
> > +#define CONFIG_SPL_SERIAL_SUPPORT
> > +#define CONFIG_SPL_GPIO_SUPPORT
>
> The comment above does not relate to the definitions here. Is it
> misplaced, or not correct?
Damn, remnant of my experimentation.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-19 11:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-19 4:10 [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/6] imx: Align the imximage header and payload to multiples of 4k Marek Vasut
2013-04-19 4:10 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/6] nand: Add SPL_NAND support to mxc_nand_spl Marek Vasut
2013-04-19 8:38 ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2013-04-19 9:35 ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2013-04-19 11:14 ` Marek Vasut
2013-04-19 11:55 ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2013-04-19 13:46 ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2013-04-19 17:08 ` Marek Vasut
2013-04-20 13:00 ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2013-04-19 17:06 ` Marek Vasut
2013-04-20 13:06 ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2013-04-20 17:09 ` Marek Vasut
2013-04-19 13:00 ` Philip Paeps
2013-04-19 14:48 ` Philip Paeps
2013-04-19 14:53 ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2013-04-19 15:09 ` Philip Paeps
2013-04-19 15:21 ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2013-04-19 15:28 ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2013-04-19 15:41 ` Philip Paeps
2013-04-19 16:20 ` Tom Rini
2013-04-19 17:11 ` Marek Vasut
2013-04-19 4:10 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/6] arm: imx: Fix u-boot-with-nand-spl.imx target Marek Vasut
2013-04-19 8:56 ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2013-04-19 11:16 ` Marek Vasut
2013-04-19 11:42 ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2013-04-19 11:51 ` Marek Vasut
2013-04-19 11:55 ` Tom Rini
2013-04-19 17:04 ` Marek Vasut
2013-04-19 4:10 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/6] arm: mx5: Add SPL support code to MX5 Marek Vasut
2013-04-19 9:03 ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2013-04-19 13:10 ` Philip Paeps
2013-04-20 10:28 ` Marek Vasut
2013-04-21 0:38 ` Marek Vasut
2013-05-05 16:06 ` Stefano Babic
2013-04-19 4:10 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 5/6] arm: mx5: Add NAND clock handling Marek Vasut
2013-04-19 9:02 ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2013-04-19 9:08 ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2013-04-19 11:18 ` Marek Vasut
2013-04-19 11:32 ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2013-05-05 16:04 ` Stefano Babic
2013-04-19 4:10 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 6/6] arm: mx5: Add support for DENX M53EVK Marek Vasut
2013-04-19 5:52 ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-04-19 11:58 ` Marek Vasut [this message]
2013-04-19 12:58 ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-04-21 0:43 ` Marek Vasut
2013-04-21 6:35 ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-04-21 14:42 ` Marek Vasut
2013-04-21 22:13 ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-04-21 23:09 ` Marek Vasut
2013-04-22 11:19 ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-04-25 19:07 ` Marek Vasut
2013-04-19 9:22 ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2013-04-19 11:44 ` Marek Vasut
2013-04-19 12:54 ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2013-04-19 13:56 ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2013-04-19 14:49 ` Fabio Estevam
2013-04-21 2:32 ` Marek Vasut
2013-04-19 8:15 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/6] imx: Align the imximage header and payload to multiples of 4k Benoît Thébaudeau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201304191358.25181.marex@denx.de \
--to=marex@denx.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.