From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastian Blank Subject: Re: debian xen 4.1 and 3.8.x kernel (from experimental) Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 10:21:54 +0200 Message-ID: <20130422082154.GA6930@waldi.eu.org> References: <6035A0D088A63A46850C3988ED045A4B4D73B727@BITCOM1.int.sbss.com.au> <20130420114549.GA18893@waldi.eu.org> <5175001502000078000CF5FB@nat28.tlf.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5175001502000078000CF5FB@nat28.tlf.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich Cc: James Harper , "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 08:17:09AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 01:18:09AM +0000, James Harper wrote: > >> Does this mean that Debian is compiling the kernel incorrectly (in which > > case I'll file a bug), or is my Xen now too old to support it? > > This means your Xen is older then the version in Wheezy and lacks > > support for XZ. > Which is being added in 4.1.5 ... Nope, in case of Debian it got added in 4.1.3-7: | xen (4.1.3-7) unstable; urgency=low | | * Add support for XZ compressed Linux kernels to hypervisor and userspace | based loaders, it is needed for any Linux kernels newer then Wheezy. | (closes: #695056) | | -- Bastian Blank Tue, 11 Dec 2012 18:54:59 +0100 Bastian -- Suffocating together ... would create heroic camaraderie. -- Khan Noonian Singh, "Space Seed", stardate 3142.8