All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: "Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>,
	"Andre Przywara" <andre@andrep.de>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Jörg Rödel" <joro@8bytes.org>,
	x86-ml <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2] kvm: Emulate MOVBE
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 11:42:08 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130424084208.GI12401@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51771E53.30800@zytor.com>

On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 04:50:43PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 04/23/2013 04:41 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > 
> > Btw, in thinking about this more, I'm kinda sceptical we want to use the
> > CPUID layout for this new KVM_GET_EMULATED_* ioctl. And the reason why
> > I'm sceptical is that not every instruction is behind a CPUID capability
> > bit and if we want to tell userspace that we do emulate any insn, even
> > one for which there's no CPUID bit, we're going to have to either
> > simulate a kvm-specific CPUID leaf or, maybe even better, come up with
> > our own format for emulated capabilities. Maybe a bit vector with set
> > bits for the respective capability, or something more nifty.
> > 
> > In any case, it doesn't really need to be CPUID-like, IMHO.
> > 
> 
> Using CPUID has the major advantage that it is well-defined.
> 
This. And I really hope vendors will not add instructions without
corespondent CPUID bits nowadays.

--
			Gleb.

  reply	other threads:[~2013-04-24  9:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-09 23:46 [RFC PATCH] Emulate MOVBE Borislav Petkov
2013-04-10  0:03 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-04-10  0:04   ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-10  9:53     ` Borislav Petkov
2013-04-10  9:29 ` Andre Przywara
2013-04-10 10:08   ` Gleb Natapov
2013-04-10 10:17     ` Borislav Petkov
2013-04-10 10:21       ` Gleb Natapov
2013-04-10 10:39     ` Andre Przywara
2013-04-10 12:16       ` Gleb Natapov
2013-04-11  0:18         ` [PATCH -v2] kvm: " Borislav Petkov
2013-04-11 14:28           ` Gleb Natapov
2013-04-11 15:37             ` Borislav Petkov
2013-04-14  7:41               ` Gleb Natapov
2013-04-14 17:32                 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-04-14 18:36                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-14 19:09                     ` Borislav Petkov
2013-04-14 19:40                       ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-16 17:42                   ` Gleb Natapov
2013-04-17 11:04                     ` Borislav Petkov
2013-04-17 13:38                       ` Gleb Natapov
2013-04-17 14:02                         ` Borislav Petkov
2013-04-18 22:48                           ` Borislav Petkov
2013-04-21  9:46                             ` Gleb Natapov
2013-04-21 11:30                               ` Borislav Petkov
2013-04-21 12:51                                 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-04-23 23:41                                   ` Borislav Petkov
2013-04-23 23:50                                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-24  8:42                                       ` Gleb Natapov [this message]
2013-04-24  8:47                                       ` Borislav Petkov
2013-04-14  8:43           ` Gleb Natapov
2013-04-14 21:02             ` Borislav Petkov
2013-04-16 11:36               ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-04-21 11:46                 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-04-21 12:23                   ` Borislav Petkov
2013-04-22  8:53                     ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-04-22  9:38                       ` Borislav Petkov
2013-04-22  9:42                         ` Gleb Natapov
2013-04-22  9:52                           ` Borislav Petkov
2013-04-22  9:58                             ` Gleb Natapov
2013-04-22 13:49                               ` Borislav Petkov
2013-04-26 16:08                         ` Borislav Petkov
2013-04-16 11:47     ` [RFC PATCH] " Paolo Bonzini
2013-04-16 12:08       ` Borislav Petkov
2013-04-16 12:13         ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-16 17:28       ` Gleb Natapov
2013-04-17 10:42         ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-04-17 13:33           ` Gleb Natapov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130424084208.GI12401@redhat.com \
    --to=gleb@redhat.com \
    --cc=andre@andrep.de \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.