From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Cc: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>,
Eric Northup <digitaleric@google.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>, KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
Asias He <asias@redhat.com>,
jasowang@redhat.com, Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm tools: virtio-net mergable rx buffers
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 12:23:28 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130424092328.GC11245@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOJsxLFwL+GvC1B14K4F+Q=73SLiyu9S_bV43eP3MOE5dY94BQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 09:51:57AM +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 04/23/2013 12:35 PM, Eric Northup wrote:
> >> Do you care about guests with drivers that don't negotiate
> >> VIRTIO_NET_F_MRG_RXBUF?
>
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 5:51 AM, Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com> wrote:
> > We usually try to keep backward compatibility, but in this case
> > mergable RX buffers are about 5 years old now, so it's safe to
> > assume they'll be running in any guest.
> >
> > Unless there is a specific reason to allow working without them
> > I'd rather keep the code simple in this case.
>
> Are there such guests around? What's the failure scenario for them
> after this patch?
>
> Pekka
Warning: have not looked at the patch, just a general comment.
I think it's reasonable to assume embedded guests such as PXE won't
negotiate any features. And, running old guests is one of the reasons
people use virtualization at all. So 5 years is not a lot.
In any case, stick to the device spec please, if you want it changed
please send a spec patch, don't deviate from it randomly.
--
MST
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-24 9:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-23 0:32 [PATCH] kvm tools: virtio-net mergable rx buffers Sasha Levin
2013-04-23 9:06 ` Pekka Enberg
2013-04-23 14:19 ` Asias He
2013-04-23 15:01 ` Sasha Levin
2013-04-23 16:35 ` Eric Northup
2013-04-24 2:51 ` Sasha Levin
2013-04-24 6:51 ` Pekka Enberg
2013-04-24 9:23 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2013-04-29 0:44 ` Rusty Russell
2013-04-29 2:36 ` Sasha Levin
2013-04-24 5:32 ` Asias He
2013-04-24 9:35 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130424092328.GC11245@redhat.com \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=asias@redhat.com \
--cc=digitaleric@google.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=sasha.levin@oracle.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.