From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Corey Ashford <cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] signal x86: Propage RF EFLAGS bit throught the signal restore call
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 17:24:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130424152412.GB6993@somewhere> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1362940871-24486-2-git-send-email-jolsa@redhat.com>
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 07:41:06PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> Adding RF EFLAGS bit to be restored on return from signal from
> the original register context before the signal was entered.
>
> This will prevent the RF flag to disappear when returning
> from exception due to the signal handler being executed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
> Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
> Cc: Corey Ashford <cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
> Cc: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>
> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/ia32/ia32_signal.c | 2 --
> arch/x86/include/asm/sighandling.h | 4 ++--
> arch/x86/kernel/signal.c | 6 ------
> 3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/ia32/ia32_signal.c b/arch/x86/ia32/ia32_signal.c
> index cf1a471..bccfca6 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/ia32/ia32_signal.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/ia32/ia32_signal.c
> @@ -34,8 +34,6 @@
> #include <asm/sys_ia32.h>
> #include <asm/smap.h>
>
> -#define FIX_EFLAGS __FIX_EFLAGS
> -
> int copy_siginfo_to_user32(compat_siginfo_t __user *to, siginfo_t *from)
> {
> int err = 0;
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/sighandling.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/sighandling.h
> index beff97f..7a95816 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/sighandling.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/sighandling.h
> @@ -7,10 +7,10 @@
>
> #include <asm/processor-flags.h>
>
> -#define __FIX_EFLAGS (X86_EFLAGS_AC | X86_EFLAGS_OF | \
> +#define FIX_EFLAGS (X86_EFLAGS_AC | X86_EFLAGS_OF | \
> X86_EFLAGS_DF | X86_EFLAGS_TF | X86_EFLAGS_SF | \
> X86_EFLAGS_ZF | X86_EFLAGS_AF | X86_EFLAGS_PF | \
> - X86_EFLAGS_CF)
> + X86_EFLAGS_CF | X86_EFLAGS_RF)
>
> void signal_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, void __user *frame, char *where);
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/signal.c b/arch/x86/kernel/signal.c
> index 6956299..9df4c0b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/signal.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/signal.c
> @@ -43,12 +43,6 @@
>
> #include <asm/sigframe.h>
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
> -# define FIX_EFLAGS (__FIX_EFLAGS | X86_EFLAGS_RF)
Does anybody know why we had RF not restored in x86-32?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-24 15:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-10 18:41 [PATCHv2 0/6] perf, signal x86: Fix breakpoint events overflow handling Jiri Olsa
2013-03-10 18:41 ` [PATCH 1/6] signal x86: Propage RF EFLAGS bit throught the signal restore call Jiri Olsa
2013-04-16 1:05 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-04-16 14:42 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-04-17 20:02 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-04-24 15:39 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-04-24 15:24 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2013-03-10 18:41 ` [PATCH 2/6] signal x86: Clear RF EFLAGS bit for signal handler Jiri Olsa
2013-03-10 18:41 ` [PATCH 3/6] signal x86: Merge EFLAGS bit clearing into single statement Jiri Olsa
2013-03-10 18:41 ` [PATCH 4/6] perf: Fix hw breakpoints overflow period sampling Jiri Olsa
2013-04-04 16:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-03-10 18:41 ` [PATCH 5/6] perf tests: Test breakpoint overflow signal handler Jiri Olsa
2013-03-21 11:38 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Jiri Olsa
2013-03-10 18:41 ` [PATCH 6/6] perf tests: Test breakpoint overflow signal handler counts Jiri Olsa
2013-03-21 11:39 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Jiri Olsa
2013-03-24 15:15 ` [PATCHv2 0/6] perf, signal x86: Fix breakpoint events overflow handling Jiri Olsa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130424152412.GB6993@somewhere \
--to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vincent.weaver@maine.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.