From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: Exynos regressions w.r.t. config and debuggability due to multiplatform Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 19:31:24 +0200 Message-ID: <201304251931.25028.arnd@arndb.de> References: <201304241703.49864.arnd@arndb.de> <51794CD3.4080807@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.171]:50089 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932766Ab3DYRbg (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Apr 2013 13:31:36 -0400 In-Reply-To: <51794CD3.4080807@samsung.com> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: Kukjin Kim Cc: Olof Johansson , "linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" On Thursday 25 April 2013, Kukjin Kim wrote: > > On 04/25/13 00:03, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Wednesday 24 April 2013, Olof Johansson wrote: > >> I think we should hold off on multiplatform for exynos until it works > >> better, i.e. 3.11. > >> > I think, this would be better choice for now if it's not urgent... > I spent a lot of time on it because it's a priority for Linaro, but that means I'm biased in the question of whether to merge it or not. It should only get in if you and Olof think it's a good idea. Arnd From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann) Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 19:31:24 +0200 Subject: Exynos regressions w.r.t. config and debuggability due to multiplatform In-Reply-To: <51794CD3.4080807@samsung.com> References: <201304241703.49864.arnd@arndb.de> <51794CD3.4080807@samsung.com> Message-ID: <201304251931.25028.arnd@arndb.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thursday 25 April 2013, Kukjin Kim wrote: > > On 04/25/13 00:03, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Wednesday 24 April 2013, Olof Johansson wrote: > >> I think we should hold off on multiplatform for exynos until it works > >> better, i.e. 3.11. > >> > I think, this would be better choice for now if it's not urgent... > I spent a lot of time on it because it's a priority for Linaro, but that means I'm biased in the question of whether to merge it or not. It should only get in if you and Olof think it's a good idea. Arnd