All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] Revert: add new libnetfilter_queue API for libmnl
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 09:32:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130426073239.GD32324@breakpoint.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130426013601.GA4510@localhost>

Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 12:43:28PM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote:
> > This is a partial revert of a0c885ae5a79457aa592cb70c27a7dee619762a4
> > 
> > Specifically, it removes the header linux/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.h
> > added in that commit.
> 
> The idea for caching that file header is to make sure
> libnetfilter_queue compiles out of the box, without external linux
> kernel headers installed in the system. The idea is to make sure the
> libraries compilation does not break in case there's an old library
> header installed in the system.
> 
> > 1), there is already a /usr/include/linux/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.h,
> >     which is part of the linux kernel API
> 
> As said, that file may not be available or may be stale.

Yes, but at this time the system-wide header is used, and not this copy.
Compile of libnetfilter_queue breaks with the other patches applied
because the new attribute is missing from the system header.

> > 2), we already have
> >     include/libnetfilter_queue/linux_nfnetlink_queue.h
> 
> That was added initially for the old libnetfilter_queue API, I'd like
> to get rid of it. It's currently being installed and it results in
> (very likely) two duplicated headers in the system (the one from the
> linux kernel headers and this one from libnetfilter_queue).

Hrm, yes.  I thought that was intentional.
Or are you saying that you basically just want to rename
linux_nfnetlink_queue.h and carry a copy of nfnetlink_queue.h instead?

> Once the old API is deprecated (we should do that anytime soon), we
> can get finally rid of linux_nfnetlink_queue.h

I guess what confused me is that there is nothing related to the old
api in that header, so we might as well keep it?

> > which contains the same definitions/structures/macros, so it makes
> > little sense to have two headers in libnetfilter_queue that share
> > almost their entire content.
> > 
> > [ worse, the nfnetlink_queue.h header reverted here actually is
> > incompatible with mainline kernels, since a few defines have the
> > wrong value ... ]
> 
> Then, please refresh it.

Alright, but its not enough; the build system would require
additional treatment to give precedence to that header when compiling
the library.

  reply	other threads:[~2013-04-26  7:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-25 10:43 [PATCH 0/4] libnetfilter_queue: gso handling support Florian Westphal
2013-04-25 10:43 ` [PATCH 1/4] Revert: add new libnetfilter_queue API for libmnl Florian Westphal
2013-04-26  1:36   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2013-04-26  7:32     ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2013-04-26  9:37       ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2013-04-26 10:02         ` Florian Westphal
2013-04-26 10:12           ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2013-04-26 10:30             ` Florian Westphal
2013-04-25 10:43 ` [PATCH 2/4] examples/nf-queue: handle recv error, use larger buffer Florian Westphal
2013-04-26  1:42   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2013-04-26  7:27     ` Florian Westphal
2013-04-25 10:43 ` [PATCH 3/4] src: add new GSO handling capabilities Florian Westphal
2013-04-25 10:43 ` [PATCH 4/4] examples/nf-queue: receive large gso packets Florian Westphal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130426073239.GD32324@breakpoint.cc \
    --to=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.