From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
Fr??d??ric Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86: make DR*_RESERVED unsigned long
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 19:15:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130426171526.GA30875@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <517AAED5.7040400@zytor.com>
On 04/26, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>
> On 04/26/2013 09:38 AM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >
> > - do_debug:
> >
> > dr6 &= ~DR6_RESERVED;
> >
> > this also wrongly clears 32-63 bits. Fortunately these
> > bits are reserved and must be zero.
>
> I don't think this is wrongly at all.
OK, I meant that it also clears the bits that are not specified in
DR6_RESERVED mask.
> The whole point is to mask out
> the bits that the handler doesn't want to deal with, so masking out the
> reserved bits [63:32] seems reasonable to me.
Then we should do
- #define DR6_RESERVED 0xFFFF0FF0
+ #define DR6_RESERVED 0xFFFFFFFFFFFF0FF0
?
or what? (just in case, I will happily agree with "do nothing" ;)
> The comment should probably be corrected, though.
Which one?
/* Define reserved bits in DR6 which are always set to 1 */
#define DR6_RESERVED (0xFFFF0FF0UL)
/* Filter out all the reserved bits which are preset to 1 */
dr6 &= ~DR6_RESERVED;
I guess both should be updated then. But if I read the doc correctly
the lower reserved bits are set to 1.
However do_debug() does set_debugreg(0, 6) and this looks correct, the
doc says "debug handlers should clear the register before returning to
the interrupted task".
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-26 17:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CA+55aFwpLu0qNms=hkQr43yqD0K9DgESNm91OEWKT1ZuT8MU6Q@mail.gmail.com>
2013-04-23 0:23 ` Unsigned widening casts of binary "not" operations Linus Torvalds
2013-04-23 8:59 ` David Laight
2013-04-23 8:59 ` David Laight
2013-04-23 14:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-04-23 15:24 ` David Laight
2013-04-23 15:24 ` David Laight
2013-04-23 15:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-04-23 15:52 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-04-23 16:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-04-23 17:37 ` David Miller
2013-04-23 17:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-04-23 17:56 ` David Miller
2013-04-23 18:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-04-24 12:36 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-04-23 0:32 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-23 13:00 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-04-24 7:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-04-24 7:47 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2013-04-25 1:13 ` Lin Ming
2013-04-24 17:07 ` [PATCH] x86: make DR*_RESERVED unsigned long Oleg Nesterov
2013-04-24 18:45 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-25 14:48 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-04-26 16:38 ` [PATCH v2] " Oleg Nesterov
2013-04-26 16:44 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-26 17:15 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2013-04-27 14:45 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-04-27 16:20 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-28 0:58 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-04-28 17:27 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-04-28 17:32 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-28 17:39 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-04-28 17:43 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-24 22:48 ` [PATCH] " Frederic Weisbecker
2013-04-24 23:06 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-24 23:31 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-04-25 1:20 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-26 14:20 ` [tip:perf/core] perf/x86/intel/P4: Robistify P4 PMU types tip-bot for Ingo Molnar
2013-04-26 16:13 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-04-26 16:24 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2013-04-26 16:39 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-04-26 16:46 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2013-04-27 16:14 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-04-27 16:33 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130426171526.GA30875@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.