From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Jacob Shin <jacob.shin@amd.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
x86@kernel.org, Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] perf/x86/amd: AMD support for bp_len > HW_BREAKPOINT_LEN_8
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 18:10:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130427161028.GA27310@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130427154026.GA3529@jshin-Toonie>
On 04/27, Jacob Shin wrote:
>
> On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 05:05:10PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > ...
> > > + if (info->mask)
> > > + set_dr_addr_mask(0, i);
> >
> > I agree we should clear addr_mask anyway.
> >
> > But I am just curious, what if we do not? I mean what will the hardware
> > do if this breakpoint was already disabled but the mask wasn't cleared?
>
> Oh, it is fine if we don't and we are not using breakpoints, however I
> was trying to account for per-thread events sharing the same DR
> register, in that case we don't want previous event's mask value still
> in the MSR.
Aha, so CPU "remembers" the non-cleared mask and this can affect the
next "enable". Thanks.
> > Suppose that the kernel was compiled without CONFIG_CPU_SUP_AMD.
> > Then perf_event_open(attr => { .bp_len == 16 }) will succeed, but
> > this breakpoint won't actually work as expected?
>
> Well, on non-AMD, even if we have CONFIG_CPU_SUP_AMD=y or not,
> cpu_has_bpext (x86 CPUID check) will fail.
>
> On AMD, if we don't have CONFIG_CPU_SUP_AMD=y then we can't even boot.
Heh, I didn't know ;)
OK, I think the patch is fine then.
Except... cough, the last nit, I promise ;)
Currently this doesn't matter, the only caller of modify_user_hw_breakpoint()
is ptrace, and it can't use bp_len != HW_BREAKPOINT_LEN_*.
But still, I think your patch needs a small fixlet,
- /* info->len == info->mask == 0 */
+ info->mask = 0;
Or we can do this later.
And while this is purely cosmetic (feel free to ignore), perhaps we
can join the bp_len checks and move cpu_has_bpext from _validate to
_build, this looks a little bit cleaner imho. IOW,
info->mask == 0;
switch (bp->attr.bp_len) {
default:
if (!is_power_of_2(bp->attr.bp_len))
return -EINVAL;
if (!cpu_has_bpext)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
info->mask = bp->attr.bp_len - 1;
/* fallthrough */
case HW_BREAKPOINT_LEN_1:
info->len = X86_BREAKPOINT_LEN_1;
break;
case HW_BREAKPOINT_LEN_2:
info->len = X86_BREAKPOINT_LEN_2;
break;
case HW_BREAKPOINT_LEN_4:
info->len = X86_BREAKPOINT_LEN_4;
break;
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
case HW_BREAKPOINT_LEN_8:
info->len = X86_BREAKPOINT_LEN_8;
break;
#endif
}
Then arch_validate_hwbkpt_settings() only needs
case X86_BREAKPOINT_LEN_1:
align = 0;
+ if (info->mask)
+ align = mask;
change.
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-27 16:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-26 18:57 [PATCH 0/3] perf/x86/amd: AMD Family 16h Data Breakpoint Extensions Jacob Shin
2013-04-26 18:57 ` [PATCH 1/3] perf/x86/amd: AMD support for bp_len > HW_BREAKPOINT_LEN_8 Jacob Shin
2013-04-27 15:05 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-04-27 15:14 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-04-27 15:40 ` Jacob Shin
2013-04-27 16:10 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2013-04-28 6:05 ` Jacob Shin
2013-04-26 18:57 ` [PATCH 2/3] perf tools: allow user to specify hardware breakpoint bp_len Jacob Shin
2013-04-27 16:58 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-04-27 17:34 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-04-28 5:44 ` Jacob Shin
2013-04-28 5:50 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-28 16:12 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-04-26 18:57 ` [PATCH 3/3] perf tools: add hardware breakpoint bp_len test cases Jacob Shin
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-04-28 6:05 [PATCH V4 0/3] perf/x86/amd: AMD Family 16h Data Breakpoint Extensions Jacob Shin
2013-04-28 6:05 ` [PATCH 1/3] perf/x86/amd: AMD support for bp_len > HW_BREAKPOINT_LEN_8 Jacob Shin
2013-10-02 16:11 [PATCH V5 0/3] perf/x86/amd: AMD Family 16h Data Breakpoint Extensions suravee.suthikulpanit
2013-10-02 16:11 ` [PATCH 1/3] perf/x86/amd: AMD support for bp_len > HW_BREAKPOINT_LEN_8 suravee.suthikulpanit
2013-10-31 9:58 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-10-31 10:48 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-10-31 11:23 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-11-02 4:34 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-11-08 21:22 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2013-11-08 14:40 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-10-31 16:49 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-11-08 19:41 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-11-09 15:11 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-11-09 15:32 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-11-09 15:54 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-11-11 15:44 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-11-11 17:51 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-12-02 23:12 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-12-04 13:57 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-12-10 14:43 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-12-10 14:52 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-12-10 15:23 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-12-10 16:19 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-12-10 16:30 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-12-11 12:05 ` Suravee Suthikulanit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130427161028.GA27310@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jacob.shin@amd.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.