Re: [meta-gnome/meta-xfce 1/4] gdm: fix postinst-code to unbreak first boot issues

[Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1375 bytes --]

On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 04:58:13PM +0200, Andreas Müller wrote:
> On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Andreas Müller
> <schnitzeltony@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 9:33 AM, Andreas Müller
> > <schnitzeltony@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >> On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 9:31 PM, Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 08:33:57PM +0200, Andreas Müller wrote:
> >>>> Exiting postinst code leaves systemd.bbclass offline postinst code unexecuted,
> >>>> causes postinst not to finish at first boot (gdm.service is not aliased to
> >>>> display-manager.service -> started much too early) and is not neccesary:
> >>>> language preparation can be done offline.
> > Just learned that the chown code does not belong to do_install. Shall
> > I send a V2 or a follow up?
> I was too fast - it still discussed [1]

Do you want me to apply these 4 and then add better fix in follow-up if
needed? From that discussion it looks like you did all what you could in 
gdm :).

> [1] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2013-May/039111.html
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 205 bytes --]