All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Stephen Elliott <techweb@ntlworld.com>
Cc: 'Andreas Dilger' <adilger@dilger.ca>, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2nd Attempt - FSCK Errors
Date: Fri, 3 May 2013 09:14:21 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130503131421.GC32297@thunk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <000f01ce47ec$ca7767c0$5f663740$@ntlworld.com>

What you've shown us makes me suspicious about whether the hardware
device is sane or not.  In the previous e2fsck run, it set i_size to a
non-zero value.  Yet when debugfs tries to read the same inode, it's
now seeing all zero's.

So that implies the disk (or software raid device; you haven't been
clear what the underlying storage is for this file system) is not
returning the same information for a particular block as was
previously written.

If the underlying block device is not stable, there really is nothing
for e2fsck to do.  You might want to check /var/log/messages for any
error messages relating to the underlying storage device(s).  If
you're seeing I/O errors in the log files, that would be another hint.

At this point, my recommendation to you is to find a separate disk (or
RAID array if necessary) which is as big as the underlying disk, and
do an image copy (via dd or ddrescue) to a known-good storage device,
and then retry the e2fsck on this copy of the file system.

Regards,

						- Ted


  reply	other threads:[~2013-05-03 13:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-30 14:00 2nd Attempt - FSCK Errors Stephen Elliott
2013-04-30 16:14 ` Andreas Dilger
2013-04-30 16:25   ` Stephen Elliott
2013-04-30 17:58   ` Stephen Elliott
2013-05-03 10:55   ` Stephen Elliott
2013-05-03 13:14     ` Theodore Ts'o [this message]
2013-05-03 13:31       ` Stephen Elliott
2013-05-03 15:29         ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-05-03 18:42           ` Stephen Elliott
2013-05-03 21:31             ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-05-05 11:19               ` Stephen Elliott
2013-05-08 14:45               ` Stephen Elliott
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-05-08 15:20 Stephen Elliott
2013-05-08 16:22 ` Andreas Dilger
2013-05-08 16:25   ` Stephen Elliott

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130503131421.GC32297@thunk.org \
    --to=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=adilger@dilger.ca \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=techweb@ntlworld.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.