From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: 3.9+ tty lockdep trace.
Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 11:40:59 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130506184059.GA22897@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130506180020.GB1309@redhat.com>
On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 02:00:20PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 11:47:23AM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > [ 6760.076083] ======================================================
> > [ 6760.076084] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
> > [ 6760.076086] 3.9.0+ #16 Not tainted
> > [ 6760.076086] -------------------------------------------------------
> > [ 6760.076087] (agetty)/26163 is trying to acquire lock:
> > [ 6760.076096] blocked: ((&buf->work)){+.+...}, instance: ffff88011c8b0020, at: [<ffffffff81062065>] flush_work+0x5/0x2e0
> > [ 6760.076096]
> > but task is already holding lock:
> > [ 6760.076102] blocked: (console_lock){+.+.+.}, instance: ffffffff81c2fde0, at: [<ffffffff813bc201>] vt_ioctl+0xb61/0x1230
> > [ 6760.076103]
> > which lock already depends on the new lock.
> >
> > [ 6760.076103]
> > the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
> > [ 6760.076106]
> > -> #1 (console_lock){+.+.+.}:
> > [ 6760.076111] [<ffffffff810b3f74>] lock_acquire+0xa4/0x210
> > [ 6760.076115] [<ffffffff810416c7>] console_lock+0x77/0x80
> > [ 6760.076118] [<ffffffff813c3dcd>] con_flush_chars+0x2d/0x50
> > [ 6760.076123] [<ffffffff813b32b2>] n_tty_receive_buf+0x122/0x14d0
> > [ 6760.076126] [<ffffffff813b7709>] flush_to_ldisc+0x119/0x170
> > [ 6760.076130] [<ffffffff81064381>] process_one_work+0x211/0x700
> > [ 6760.076133] [<ffffffff8106498b>] worker_thread+0x11b/0x3a0
> > [ 6760.076137] [<ffffffff8106ce5d>] kthread+0xed/0x100
> > [ 6760.076141] [<ffffffff81601cac>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
> > [ 6760.076143]
> > -> #0 ((&buf->work)){+.+...}:
> > [ 6760.076146] [<ffffffff810b349a>] __lock_acquire+0x193a/0x1c00
> > [ 6760.076149] [<ffffffff810b3f74>] lock_acquire+0xa4/0x210
> > [ 6760.076151] [<ffffffff810620ae>] flush_work+0x4e/0x2e0
> > [ 6760.076153] [<ffffffff81065305>] __cancel_work_timer+0x95/0x130
> > [ 6760.076155] [<ffffffff810653b0>] cancel_work_sync+0x10/0x20
> > [ 6760.076157] [<ffffffff813b8212>] tty_port_destroy+0x12/0x20
> > [ 6760.076159] [<ffffffff813c65e8>] vc_deallocate+0xf8/0x110
> > [ 6760.076162] [<ffffffff813bc20c>] vt_ioctl+0xb6c/0x1230
> > [ 6760.076165] [<ffffffff813b01a5>] tty_ioctl+0x285/0xd50
> > [ 6760.076168] [<ffffffff811ba825>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x305/0x530
> > [ 6760.076170] [<ffffffff811baad1>] sys_ioctl+0x81/0xa0
> > [ 6760.076174] [<ffffffff81601d59>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
> > [ 6760.076174]
> > other info that might help us debug this:
> >
> > [ 6760.076175] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
> >
> > [ 6760.076175] CPU0 CPU1
> > [ 6760.076176] ---- ----
> > [ 6760.076177] lock(console_lock);
> > [ 6760.076179] lock((&buf->work));
> > [ 6760.076180] lock(console_lock);
> > [ 6760.076181] lock((&buf->work));
> > [ 6760.076182]
> > *** DEADLOCK ***
> >
> > [ 6760.076183] 1 lock on stack by (agetty)/26163:
> > [ 6760.076188] #0: blocked: (console_lock){+.+.+.}, instance: ffffffff81c2fde0, at: [<ffffffff813bc201>] vt_ioctl+0xb61/0x1230
> > [ 6760.076188]
> > stack backtrace:
> > [ 6760.076190] Pid: 26163, comm: (agetty) Not tainted 3.9.0+ #16
> > [ 6760.076191] Call Trace:
> > [ 6760.076196] [<ffffffff815edb14>] print_circular_bug+0x200/0x20e
> > [ 6760.076199] [<ffffffff810b349a>] __lock_acquire+0x193a/0x1c00
> > [ 6760.076203] [<ffffffff8100a269>] ? sched_clock+0x9/0x10
> > [ 6760.076206] [<ffffffff8100a269>] ? sched_clock+0x9/0x10
> > [ 6760.076209] [<ffffffff8100a200>] ? native_sched_clock+0x20/0x80
> > [ 6760.076213] [<ffffffff810b3f74>] lock_acquire+0xa4/0x210
> > [ 6760.076215] [<ffffffff81062065>] ? flush_work+0x5/0x2e0
> > [ 6760.076217] [<ffffffff810620ae>] flush_work+0x4e/0x2e0
> > [ 6760.076219] [<ffffffff81062065>] ? flush_work+0x5/0x2e0
> > [ 6760.076222] [<ffffffff810b15db>] ? mark_held_locks+0xbb/0x140
> > [ 6760.076226] [<ffffffff8113c8a3>] ? __free_pages_ok.part.57+0x93/0xc0
> > [ 6760.076229] [<ffffffff810b15db>] ? mark_held_locks+0xbb/0x140
> > [ 6760.076231] [<ffffffff810652f2>] ? __cancel_work_timer+0x82/0x130
> > [ 6760.076234] [<ffffffff81065305>] __cancel_work_timer+0x95/0x130
> > [ 6760.076236] [<ffffffff810653b0>] cancel_work_sync+0x10/0x20
> > [ 6760.076238] [<ffffffff813b8212>] tty_port_destroy+0x12/0x20
> > [ 6760.076240] [<ffffffff813c65e8>] vc_deallocate+0xf8/0x110
> > [ 6760.076243] [<ffffffff813bc20c>] vt_ioctl+0xb6c/0x1230
> > [ 6760.076246] [<ffffffff810aec41>] ? lock_release_holdtime.part.30+0xa1/0x170
> > [ 6760.076250] [<ffffffff813b01a5>] tty_ioctl+0x285/0xd50
> > [ 6760.076254] [<ffffffff812b00f6>] ? inode_has_perm.isra.46.constprop.61+0x56/0x80
> > [ 6760.076257] [<ffffffff811ba825>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x305/0x530
> > [ 6760.076260] [<ffffffff812b04db>] ? selinux_file_ioctl+0x5b/0x110
> > [ 6760.076263] [<ffffffff811baad1>] sys_ioctl+0x81/0xa0
> > [ 6760.076266] [<ffffffff81601d59>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
>
> Just hit this again, by switching tty's during bootup.
> The previous time was switching from X to console iirc, so that seems to be
> the key to triggering this.
Sorry for not getting back to this sooner, merge window fun...
Anyway, Peter, could this be something that your ldisc patches are
triggering? That's all I can think of at the moment.
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-06 18:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-01 15:47 3.9+ tty lockdep trace Dave Jones
2013-05-06 18:00 ` Dave Jones
2013-05-06 18:40 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2013-05-07 14:14 ` Peter Hurley
2013-05-07 15:04 ` Dave Jones
2013-05-07 17:35 ` Peter Hurley
2013-05-07 18:00 ` Dave Jones
2013-05-08 21:18 ` Peter Hurley
2013-05-17 16:41 ` [PATCH] tty/vt: Fix vc_deallocate() lock order Peter Hurley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130506184059.GA22897@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peter@hurleysoftware.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.