From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] ARM: omap3: add Seagate Wireless Plus board Date: Wed, 8 May 2013 12:51:53 -0700 Message-ID: <20130508195152.GE32546@atomide.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mho-03-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.66]:11532 "EHLO mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750900Ab3EHTv5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 May 2013 15:51:57 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Jason Cooper Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org * Jason Cooper [130508 12:29]: > > Current Problem: > > There are several gaps in my understanding of how far along TI's conversion to > DT is. Should I be doing a separate board file for initializing the legacy > items? I was hoping to do it all with DT. Sorry forgot to reply to this.. No seprate board file should be needed, some devices may still need to be initialized with pdata based on the compatible flag. > Obviously, I don't expect anybody to run out and buy one of these, take it > apart, and try to boot this code. But if the omap guys could take a look at > this and give me a few pointers, I'd appreciate it. I'm kind of spinning my > wheels at the moment. > > Primarily, I'd like to get nand and usb working, so that I can read/write, > mount a rootfs and do better testing. The USB should be doable with device tree. At least both echi and musb are working properly on pandaboard. I think people have been using NAND with the gpmc DT patches, but I don't know the current status for sure. Is the hard drive on the EHCI bus or how is it connected to omap? Regards, Tony From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren) Date: Wed, 8 May 2013 12:51:53 -0700 Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/3] ARM: omap3: add Seagate Wireless Plus board In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20130508195152.GE32546@atomide.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org * Jason Cooper [130508 12:29]: > > Current Problem: > > There are several gaps in my understanding of how far along TI's conversion to > DT is. Should I be doing a separate board file for initializing the legacy > items? I was hoping to do it all with DT. Sorry forgot to reply to this.. No seprate board file should be needed, some devices may still need to be initialized with pdata based on the compatible flag. > Obviously, I don't expect anybody to run out and buy one of these, take it > apart, and try to boot this code. But if the omap guys could take a look at > this and give me a few pointers, I'd appreciate it. I'm kind of spinning my > wheels at the moment. > > Primarily, I'd like to get nand and usb working, so that I can read/write, > mount a rootfs and do better testing. The USB should be doable with device tree. At least both echi and musb are working properly on pandaboard. I think people have been using NAND with the gpmc DT patches, but I don't know the current status for sure. Is the hard drive on the EHCI bus or how is it connected to omap? Regards, Tony