From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Keith Keller <kkeller@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: vess raid stripes disappear
Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 07:27:32 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130510072732.5a9cea9d@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45ss5axrjb.ln2@goaway.wombat.san-francisco.ca.us>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1427 bytes --]
On Thu, 09 May 2013 08:32:20 -0700 Keith Keller
<kkeller@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> wrote:
> On 2013-05-09, Roman Mamedov <rm@romanrm.ru> wrote:
> >
> > I (also) was under impression that linux-raid is not just for md, but for a=
> > ll
> > kinds of RAID in GNU/Linux. It's just that historically it's mostly about m=
> > d.
>
> Indeed, the majordomo info says only this:
>
> "Welcome to the linux-raid mailing list, hosted on vger.kernel.org.
> Discussions on this list should be relevant to using RAID technologies
> with Linux. The list has a wiki howto at http://raid.wiki.kernel.org/"
>
> This is somewhat contradictory with the wiki overview:
>
> "This site is the Linux-raid kernel list community-managed reference for
> Linux software RAID as implemented in recent 2.6 kernels."
I don't see a contradiction.
The mailing list is for anything about RAID on Linux. The community formed
around the list are generally interested in various sorts of RAID on Linux.
Software RAID is a popular subtopic and for that subtopic there is a
supporting wiki. It doesn't claim to be a complete reference for linux-raid,
only for the software RAID subtopic of linux-raid.
But the 2.6 should go.
>
> So I admit to being a bit confused! Is there a consensus among the
> admins what the list topics should be?
There aren't any admins. There are only subscribers and posters.
NeilBrown
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-09 21:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-09 11:29 vess raid stripes disappear mashtin.bakir
2013-05-09 14:59 ` Keith Keller
2013-05-09 15:10 ` Roman Mamedov
2013-05-09 15:32 ` Keith Keller
2013-05-09 15:41 ` Adam Goryachev
2013-05-09 16:23 ` David Brown
2013-05-09 21:33 ` Keith Keller
2013-05-09 21:27 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2013-05-10 7:55 ` SOLVED " Stan Hoeppner
2013-05-10 12:44 ` mashtin.bakir
2013-05-10 14:17 ` Stan Hoeppner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130510072732.5a9cea9d@notabene.brown \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=kkeller@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.