From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gleb Natapov Subject: Re: [nVMX with: v3.9-11789-ge0fd9af] Stack trace when L2 guest is rebooted. Date: Sun, 12 May 2013 18:52:17 +0300 Message-ID: <20130512155217.GB26185@redhat.com> References: <518D216C.90107@siemens.com> <20130512083210.GD10830@redhat.com> <20130512123849.GK10830@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Abel Gordon , Jan Kiszka , "Nakajima, Jun" , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Kashyap Chamarthy Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:16515 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753357Ab3ELPwZ (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 May 2013 11:52:25 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 07:01:43PM +0530, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: > > So, from the above info shadow-vmcs is ruled-out. I'm trying to > > investigate further, will post details if I have new findings. > > Update: > --------- > > I just tried to create L2 w/ Fedora-19 TC4 compose of 11MAY2013, I > contibuously see the below fragment (F18/F19, whatever the L2 guest > is): > > -------------------- > .... > [ 217.938034] Uhhuh. NMI received for unknown reason 30 on CPU 0. > [ 217.938034] Do you have a strange power saving mode enabled? > .[ 222.523373] Uhhuh. NMI received for unknown reason 20 on CPU 0. > [ 222.524073] Do you have a strange power saving mode enabled? > [ 222.524073] Dazed and confused, but trying to continue > [ 243.860319] Uhhuh. NMI received for unknown reason 30 on CPU 0 > ..... > -------------------- > At the moment, L2 guest creation stuck at the above message > Are those in L2 dmesg or L1? > However I have neither HPET or NMI Watchdog enabled on L0/L1. I checked it by: > > $ cat /etc/grub2.cfg | egrep -i 'hpet|nmi' > IIRC watchdog is enabled by default. > I wonder if I'm missing something trivial, or maybe this is some kind > of bug that needs more deeper investigation. But Jan Kiszka reported > he isn't seeing any probs (but he isn't using "Haswell" ). > > Thanks. -- Gleb.