From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gleb Natapov Subject: Re: [nVMX with: v3.9-11789-ge0fd9af] Stack trace when L2 guest is rebooted. Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 09:39:23 +0300 Message-ID: <20130513063923.GC26185@redhat.com> References: <20130512083210.GD10830@redhat.com> <20130512123849.GK10830@redhat.com> <20130512155217.GB26185@redhat.com> <519088C5.8050703@siemens.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Kashyap Chamarthy , Abel Gordon , "Nakajima, Jun" , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , "kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org" To: Jan Kiszka Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:8247 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753809Ab3EMGjb (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 May 2013 02:39:31 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <519088C5.8050703@siemens.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 08:31:33AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: > On 2013-05-12 18:52, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: > >>> -------------------- > >>> .... > >>> [ 217.938034] Uhhuh. NMI received for unknown reason 30 on CPU 0. > >>> [ 217.938034] Do you have a strange power saving mode enabled? > >>> .[ 222.523373] Uhhuh. NMI received for unknown reason 20 on CPU 0. > >>> [ 222.524073] Do you have a strange power saving mode enabled? > >>> [ 222.524073] Dazed and confused, but trying to continue > >>> [ 243.860319] Uhhuh. NMI received for unknown reason 30 on CPU 0 > >>> ..... > >>> -------------------- > >>> At the moment, L2 guest creation stuck at the above message > >>> > >> Are those in L2 dmesg or L1? > > > > L2 dmesg. > > > > > >>> $ cat /etc/grub2.cfg | egrep -i 'hpet|nmi' > >>> > >> IIRC watchdog is enabled by default. > > > > Indeed, you're right. I disabled NMI on L1, and rebooted the newly > > created L2 guest starts just fine. > > NMI watchdogs go via some perf counters theses days IIRC. Can anyone > tell me which of those may be used in Kashyap's setup? I'm probably > lacking them for my guests and therefore do not see the errors. > Try running with -cpu host for L1. Your CPU definition probably lacks PMU leaf. -- Gleb.