From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/6] package infra: remove CPPFLAGS from CFLAGS
Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 20:20:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130513202047.6bd6da1b@skate> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51912140.8030901@zacarias.com.ar>
Dear Gustavo Zacarias,
On Mon, 13 May 2013 14:22:08 -0300, Gustavo Zacarias wrote:
> > After your patch, the -D_LARGEFILE_BLABLA stuff is no longer passed
> > when building this package.
> >
> > Another example, the feh package. Another one, input-tools. And I'm
> > sure there are more.
> >
> > So, I agree with the change, but I think it needs a much thorough
> > investigation of which packages are using $(TARGET_CFLAGS) without
> > passing $(TARGET_CPPFLAGS).
>
> On the build-side of things there aren't any unexpected build failures
> (allyespackageconfig that lead to my latest fixes because of other issues).
Build failures no, but packages not having large file support because
-D_LARGEFILE_BLA is not passed, cerainly.
> This is meant as a first try and i'm sure there will be packages that'll
> need to be modified, but we'd rather do this sooner rather than later,
> specially if we want to push new autotools where -D* isn't acceptable in
> CFLAGS (be it via auto* bump + autoreconf or just plain shipped
> configure in packages based on newer autotools).
Agreed.
> We could also filter out for "strict" (new auto* packages) too, but
> that's a sloppy way downhill.
Yes, we probably don't want to do that.
> I just want to keep this patchset apart from the package-fixing one,
> since it's likely this won't change much and i'm not a fan of 1/N with N
> being a huge number just to add a few patchfixes here/there (with the
> fix patches maybe even getting commited before this patchset - it
> shouldn't hurt).
I believe there should be first an audit of where TARGET_CFLAGS is
used. Then, wherever needed, fixes to ensure both TARGET_CFLAGS and
TARGET_CPPFLAGS are used (or, if possible, usage of
TARGET_CONFIGURE_OPTS). Once those fixes are made, your patch that
separates TARGET_CPPFLAGS from TARGET_CFLAGS can go in.
A quick "grep TARGET_CFLAGS" in package/ gives 110 packages using it.
In most cases, it's probably $(TARGET_CONFIGURE_OPTS) being passed +
CFLAGS="$(TARGET_CFLAGS) -bleh", which is already correct seems
CPPFLAGS is passed. But of course there might be packages that use a
custom Makefile that obeys to CFLAGS but not CPPFLAGS. Not sure what we
can do about these except slowly figuring out that they need fixing.
Best regards,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-13 18:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-13 16:40 [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/6] package infra: remove CPPFLAGS from CFLAGS Gustavo Zacarias
2013-05-13 16:40 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/6] libnspr: bump to version 4.9.6 Gustavo Zacarias
2013-05-13 16:40 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/6] libnss: bump to version 3.14.3 Gustavo Zacarias
2013-05-26 20:14 ` Peter Korsgaard
2013-05-13 16:40 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 4/6] libcurl: bump to version 7.30.0 Gustavo Zacarias
2013-05-14 22:32 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2013-05-14 22:47 ` Gustavo Zacarias
2013-05-13 16:40 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 5/6] p11-kit: new package Gustavo Zacarias
2013-05-13 16:40 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 6/6] gnutls: bump to version 3.2.0 Gustavo Zacarias
2013-05-14 22:36 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2013-05-14 22:49 ` Gustavo Zacarias
2013-05-16 6:17 ` [Buildroot] Config options for optional dependencies [was: [PATCH 6/6] gnutls: bump to version 3.2.0] Arnout Vandecappelle
2013-05-16 8:50 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-05-13 17:10 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/6] package infra: remove CPPFLAGS from CFLAGS Thomas Petazzoni
2013-05-13 17:22 ` Gustavo Zacarias
2013-05-13 18:20 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2013-05-13 22:09 ` Gustavo Zacarias
2013-05-13 23:02 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2013-05-14 7:17 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-05-14 8:54 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130513202047.6bd6da1b@skate \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.