From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 00/20] Cleanup irqchip_init calls Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 14:55:12 +0200 Message-ID: <201305151455.12603.arnd@arndb.de> References: <1368545933-7430-1-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1368545933-7430-1-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> Sender: linux-sh-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Maxime Ripard Cc: Michal Simek , Linus Walleij , Jamie Iles , Simon Horman , Magnus Damm , Christian Daudt , Viresh Kumar , David Brown , Jason Cooper , Andrew Lunn , Gregory Clement , Shawn Guo , Barry Song , Tony Prisk , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Olof Johansson List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 14 May 2013, Maxime Ripard wrote: > This is a splitted up version of the patch I previously sent to > remove the explicit declaration of irqchip_init as the init_irq callback in > the machine descriptions. > > Since it was a pretty tricky patch to merge, since it was touching a lot of > different platforms, I splitted it for each platforms, and rebased it on top > of 3.10-rc1. > > The best way to merge it is probably that each one of us take into their tree > the patches that are relevant for our architecture and send them to arm-soc > later on. Sounds good to me. I'm sure that some platform maintainers will fail to apply this though. Could you send whatever remains as a separate branch in a couple of weeks so we can directly apply it to next/cleanup? Arnd From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 12:55:12 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 00/20] Cleanup irqchip_init calls Message-Id: <201305151455.12603.arnd@arndb.de> List-Id: References: <1368545933-7430-1-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> In-Reply-To: <1368545933-7430-1-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org On Tuesday 14 May 2013, Maxime Ripard wrote: > This is a splitted up version of the patch I previously sent to > remove the explicit declaration of irqchip_init as the init_irq callback in > the machine descriptions. > > Since it was a pretty tricky patch to merge, since it was touching a lot of > different platforms, I splitted it for each platforms, and rebased it on top > of 3.10-rc1. > > The best way to merge it is probably that each one of us take into their tree > the patches that are relevant for our architecture and send them to arm-soc > later on. Sounds good to me. I'm sure that some platform maintainers will fail to apply this though. Could you send whatever remains as a separate branch in a couple of weeks so we can directly apply it to next/cleanup? Arnd From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann) Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 14:55:12 +0200 Subject: [PATCHv2 00/20] Cleanup irqchip_init calls In-Reply-To: <1368545933-7430-1-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> References: <1368545933-7430-1-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> Message-ID: <201305151455.12603.arnd@arndb.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tuesday 14 May 2013, Maxime Ripard wrote: > This is a splitted up version of the patch I previously sent to > remove the explicit declaration of irqchip_init as the init_irq callback in > the machine descriptions. > > Since it was a pretty tricky patch to merge, since it was touching a lot of > different platforms, I splitted it for each platforms, and rebased it on top > of 3.10-rc1. > > The best way to merge it is probably that each one of us take into their tree > the patches that are relevant for our architecture and send them to arm-soc > later on. Sounds good to me. I'm sure that some platform maintainers will fail to apply this though. Could you send whatever remains as a separate branch in a couple of weeks so we can directly apply it to next/cleanup? Arnd