All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kasper Dieter <dieter.kasper@ts.fujitsu.com>
To: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
Cc: "ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org" <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Kasper Dieter <Dieter.Kasper@ts.fujitsu.com>,
	"ceph-users@ceph.com" <ceph-users@ceph.com>
Subject: Re: 0.61 Cuttlefish / ceph-deploy missing in repos
Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 19:30:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130515173002.GB28468@oder.mch.fsc.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1305150846330.14301@cobra.newdream.net>

On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 05:48:22PM +0200, Sage Weil wrote:
> On Wed, 15 May 2013, Kasper Dieter wrote:
> > Hi Sage,
> > I'm a little bit confused about 'ceph-deploy' in 0.61:
> > 
> > . the 0.61 release note says: "ceph-deploy: our new deployment tool to replace 'mkcephfs'"
> > . http://ceph.com/docs/master/rados/deployment/mkcephfs/
> > 	says "To deploy a test or development cluster, you can use the mkcephfs tool. 
> > 	We do not recommend using this tool for production environments."
> 
> Adjustd this in the docs, thanks!
> 
> > . http://ceph.com/docs/master/rados/deployment/
> > 	says "MKCEPHFS (DEPRECATED)
> > 	(...) As of Ceph v0.60, it is deprecated in favor of ceph-deploy."
> > 
> > But, /usr/sbin/mkcephfs is provided by the ceph*0.61.2*rpm(s)
> > whereas ceph-deploy is missing.
> 
> ceph-deploy is packaged separately as it is designed to deploy any version 
> of Ceph (>= bobtail).  The ceph-deploy package should be in the same repos 
> as the ceph packages; if they are missing, let us know.  

yes, they are missing

e.g.
http://ceph.com/rpm-cuttlefish/fc17/x86_64/
      ceph-0.61.2-0.fc17.x86_64.rpm           13-May-2013 17:12  9.9M  
      ceph-debuginfo-0.61.2-0.fc17.x86_64.rpm 13-May-2013 17:12  278M  
      ceph-devel-0.61.2-0.fc17.x86_64.rpm     13-May-2013 17:12   36K  
      ceph-fuse-0.61.2-0.fc17.x86_64.rpm      13-May-2013 17:12  1.0M  
      ceph-radosgw-0.61.2-0.fc17.x86_64.rpm   13-May-2013 17:12  1.3M  
      ceph-release-1-0.fc17.noarch.rpm        13-May-2013 17:15  3.5K  
      ceph-test-0.61.2-0.fc17.x86_64.rpm      13-May-2013 17:12   10M  
      cephfs-java-0.61.2-0.fc17.x86_64.rpm    13-May-2013 17:12   22K  
      libcephfs1-0.61.2-0.fc17.x86_64.rpm     13-May-2013 17:12  1.3M  
      libcephfs_jni1-0.61.2-0.fc17.x86_64.rpm 13-May-2013 17:12   33K  
      librados2-0.61.2-0.fc17.x86_64.rpm      13-May-2013 17:12  1.1M  
      librbd1-0.61.2-0.fc17.x86_64.rpm        13-May-2013 17:12  224K  
      python-ceph-0.61.2-0.fc17.x86_64.rpm    13-May-2013 17:12   32K  
      rbd-fuse-0.61.2-0.fc17.x86_64.rpm       13-May-2013 17:12   12K  
      rest-bench-0.61.2-0.fc17.x86_64.rpm     13-May-2013 17:12  226K  

same in fc18, el6, sles11, ...

Best Regards,
-Dieter


> We are still 
> streamlining the build process for that package so that updates and fixes 
> (for the deployment tool) get published more quickly.
> 
> > The only way to get ceph-deploy seems to be using git:
> > git clone https://github.com/ceph/ceph-deploy.git
> 
> This also works.
> 
> Thanks!
> sage
> 
> 
> > 
> > 
> > Is this the way it should be ?
> > When will ceph-deploy be included in the Cuttlefish rpms ?
> > 
> > 
> > Best Regards,
> > -Dieter
> > 
> > 
> > On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 04:51:25AM +0200, Sage Weil wrote:
> > > Spring has arrived (at least for some of us), and a new stable release of 
> > > Ceph is ready!  Thank you to everyone who has contributed to this release!
> > > 
> > > Bigger ticket items since v0.56.x "Bobtail":
> > > 
> > >  * ceph-deploy: our new deployment tool to replace 'mkcephfs'
> > (...)
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > 

  reply	other threads:[~2013-05-15 17:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-07  2:51 0.61 Cuttlefish released Sage Weil
     [not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.00.1305061744430.9909-vIokxiIdD2AQNTJnQDzGJqxOck334EZe@public.gmane.org>
2013-05-07 10:25   ` Igor Laskovy
2013-05-07 14:25     ` [ceph-users] " Sage Weil
     [not found]     ` <CAC+dAwEnMrD8uDGLXCxa+B0hBCNfeUX5_6Aon+G8-RpvAqD-ZQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2013-05-07 16:42       ` John Wilkins
2013-05-15 11:08 ` 0.61 Cuttlefish / ceph-deploy missing Kasper Dieter
     [not found]   ` <20130515110842.GA28468-tbq9f/Eh0BZ9QGbx8OrcVQ@public.gmane.org>
2013-05-15 15:48     ` Sage Weil
2013-05-15 17:30       ` Kasper Dieter [this message]
2013-05-15 18:14         ` 0.61 Cuttlefish / ceph-deploy missing in repos Gary Lowell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130515173002.GB28468@oder.mch.fsc.net \
    --to=dieter.kasper@ts.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ceph-users@ceph.com \
    --cc=sage@inktank.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.