From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] doc: how to build Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 17:20:31 +0200 Message-ID: <201305171720.31669.thomas.monjalon@6wind.com> References: <5195F303.2080004@6wind.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5195F303.2080004-pdR9zngts4EAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org Sender: "dev" 17/05/2013 11:06, Olivier MATZ : > On 05/07/2013 05:17 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > +Build options > > + T target template (install default: *) - used with config or install > > + O output directory (default: build/) - cannot be used with install > > + V verbose > > + D debug dependencies > > + CROSS toolchain prefix > > + EXTRA_CPPFLAGS preprocessor options > > + EXTRA_CFLAGS compiler options > > + EXTRA_LDFLAGS linker options > > What do you think of replacing "Build options" by "Build variables" ? OK > I think it is not obvious that we have to use V=1 for instance for > a verbose build. Is it sufficient to change to "Build variables" ? I could add "(level number, default: 0)" but, in fact, there is only 2 levels: empty or any value in V/D variables. > > +Build targets > > + format: > > + templates in config/defconfig_*: > > + # make showconfigs > > About the "build targets", I suggest to include it in the help of T > variable. What do you think ? It is a whole subject described on several lines. I think it's clearer to have a dedicated section. -- Thomas