From: Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com>
To: Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel: Remove unnecessary cd and rm
Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 00:16:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130521221615.GG32431@jama> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <519BE69F.9060606@linux.intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2045 bytes --]
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 02:26:55PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
> Please include a a comment. The burden is on the submitter to prove
> the cd and the rm are unnecessary, not the reviewer.
>
>
> On 05/21/2013 08:39 AM, Martin Jansa wrote:
> > ---
> > meta/classes/kernel.bbclass | 7 ++-----
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/meta/classes/kernel.bbclass b/meta/classes/kernel.bbclass
> > index 3320747..47a96c5 100644
> > --- a/meta/classes/kernel.bbclass
> > +++ b/meta/classes/kernel.bbclass
> > @@ -378,13 +378,10 @@ kernel_do_deploy() {
> > ln -sf ${MODULE_TARBALL_BASE_NAME}.bin ${MODULE_TARBALL_SYMLINK_NAME}
> > fi
> >
> > - cd ${DEPLOYDIR}
> > - rm -f ${KERNEL_IMAGE_SYMLINK_NAME}.bin
> > - ln -sf ${KERNEL_IMAGE_BASE_NAME}.bin ${KERNEL_IMAGE_SYMLINK_NAME}.bin
> > - ln -sf ${KERNEL_IMAGE_BASE_NAME}.bin ${KERNEL_IMAGETYPE}
> > + ln -sf ${KERNEL_IMAGE_BASE_NAME}.bin ${DEPLOYDIR}/${KERNEL_IMAGE_SYMLINK_NAME}.bin
> > + ln -sf ${KERNEL_IMAGE_BASE_NAME}.bin ${DEPLOYDIR}/${KERNEL_IMAGETYPE}
>
> So we are now in a different directory (do we know which one?) but the
> source of the ln commands doesn't change. If we are in the same
> directory, then why add DEPLOYDIR to the destination?
yes we know which one - ${B} as defined in deploy.bbclass:
do_deploy[dirs] = "${DEPLOYDIR} ${B}", and the same is defined again (maybe unnecessary) in
kernel.bbclass
DEPLOYDIR is defined in deploy.bbclass as well
DEPLOYDIR = "${WORKDIR}/deploy-${PN}"
DEPLOYDIR is used as target for every other file deployed by do_deploy,
this was just unnecessary switching CWD to create relative symlink and I
have no idea why rm -f was used together with ln -sf.
I'll send v2, because
ln -sf ${MODULE_TARBALL_BASE_NAME}.bin ${MODULE_TARBALL_SYMLINK_NAME}
is wrong.
See related
http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/meta/classes/kernel.bbclass?id=fd5d80ab1a405cb4ef94f2cde25f8c251da490f0
--
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 205 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-21 22:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-21 15:39 [PATCH] kernel: Remove unnecessary cd and rm Martin Jansa
2013-05-21 21:26 ` Darren Hart
2013-05-21 21:41 ` Darren Hart
2013-05-21 22:16 ` Martin Jansa [this message]
2013-05-21 22:18 ` [PATCH] kernel: Remove unnecessary cd and rm, fix MODULE_TARBALL_SYMLINK_NAME creation Martin Jansa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130521221615.GG32431@jama \
--to=martin.jansa@gmail.com \
--cc=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.