From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next RFC 5/8] macvtap: eliminate linear search
Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 14:41:09 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130523114109.GB17993@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1369278753-2533-6-git-send-email-jasowang@redhat.com>
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 11:12:30AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> Linear search were used in both get_slot() and macvtap_get_queue(), this is
> because:
>
> - macvtap didn't reshuffle the array of taps when create or destroy a queue, so
> when adding a new queue, macvtap must do linear search to find a location for
> the new queue. This will also complicate the TUNSETQUEUE implementation for
> multiqueue API.
> - the queue itself didn't track the queue index, so the we must do a linear
> search in the array to find the location of a existed queue.
>
> The solution is straightforward: reshuffle the array and introduce a queue_index
> to macvtap_queue.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/macvtap.c | 63 +++++++++++++++---------------------------------
> 1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/macvtap.c b/drivers/net/macvtap.c
> index a36e49e..5fd341c 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/macvtap.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/macvtap.c
> @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ struct macvtap_queue {
> struct macvlan_dev __rcu *vlan;
> struct file *file;
> unsigned int flags;
> + u16 queue_index;
> };
>
> static struct proto macvtap_proto = {
> @@ -84,30 +85,10 @@ static const struct proto_ops macvtap_socket_ops;
> */
> static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(macvtap_lock);
>
> -/*
> - * get_slot: return a [unused/occupied] slot in vlan->taps[]:
> - * - if 'q' is NULL, return the first empty slot;
> - * - otherwise, return the slot this pointer occupies.
> - */
> -static int get_slot(struct macvlan_dev *vlan, struct macvtap_queue *q)
> -{
> - int i;
> -
> - for (i = 0; i < MAX_MACVTAP_QUEUES; i++) {
> - if (rcu_dereference_protected(vlan->taps[i],
> - lockdep_is_held(&macvtap_lock)) == q)
> - return i;
> - }
> -
> - /* Should never happen */
> - BUG_ON(1);
> -}
> -
> static int macvtap_set_queue(struct net_device *dev, struct file *file,
> struct macvtap_queue *q)
> {
> struct macvlan_dev *vlan = netdev_priv(dev);
> - int index;
> int err = -EBUSY;
>
> spin_lock(&macvtap_lock);
> @@ -115,12 +96,12 @@ static int macvtap_set_queue(struct net_device *dev, struct file *file,
> goto out;
>
> err = 0;
> - index = get_slot(vlan, NULL);
> rcu_assign_pointer(q->vlan, vlan);
> - rcu_assign_pointer(vlan->taps[index], q);
> + rcu_assign_pointer(vlan->taps[vlan->numvtaps], q);
> sock_hold(&q->sk);
>
> q->file = file;
> + q->queue_index = vlan->numvtaps;
> file->private_data = q;
>
> vlan->numvtaps++;
> @@ -140,16 +121,23 @@ out:
> */
> static void macvtap_put_queue(struct macvtap_queue *q)
> {
> + struct macvtap_queue *nq;
> struct macvlan_dev *vlan;
>
> spin_lock(&macvtap_lock);
> vlan = rcu_dereference_protected(q->vlan,
> lockdep_is_held(&macvtap_lock));
> if (vlan) {
> - int index = get_slot(vlan, q);
> + int index = q->queue_index;
> + BUG_ON(index >= vlan->numvtaps);
>
> - RCU_INIT_POINTER(vlan->taps[index], NULL);
> + rcu_assign_pointer(vlan->taps[index],
> + vlan->taps[vlan->numvtaps - 1]);
> RCU_INIT_POINTER(q->vlan, NULL);
> + nq = rcu_dereference_protected(vlan->taps[index],
> + lockdep_is_held(&macvtap_lock));
> + nq->queue_index = index;
> +
> sock_put(&q->sk);
Hmm this looks like a bug BTW: sock_put should be after
no one uses this tap, so must be after synchronize_rcu.
No?
> --vlan->numvtaps;
> }
So:
nq = rcu_dereference_protected(vlan->taps[vlan->numvtaps - 1],
lockdep_is_held(&macvtap_lock));
rcu_assign_pointer(vlan->taps[index], nq);
same thing?
> @@ -182,8 +170,7 @@ static struct macvtap_queue *macvtap_get_queue(struct net_device *dev,
> rxq = skb_get_rxhash(skb);
> if (rxq) {
> tap = rcu_dereference(vlan->taps[rxq % numvtaps]);
> - if (tap)
> - goto out;
> + goto out;
> }
>
> if (likely(skb_rx_queue_recorded(skb))) {
> @@ -193,17 +180,10 @@ static struct macvtap_queue *macvtap_get_queue(struct net_device *dev,
> rxq -= numvtaps;
>
> tap = rcu_dereference(vlan->taps[rxq]);
> - if (tap)
> - goto out;
> - }
> -
> - /* Everything failed - find first available queue */
> - for (rxq = 0; rxq < MAX_MACVTAP_QUEUES; rxq++) {
> - tap = rcu_dereference(vlan->taps[rxq]);
> - if (tap)
> - break;
> + goto out;
> }
>
> + tap = rcu_dereference(vlan->taps[0]);
> out:
> return tap;
> }
> @@ -221,17 +201,14 @@ static void macvtap_del_queues(struct net_device *dev)
>
> /* macvtap_put_queue can free some slots, so go through all slots */
> spin_lock(&macvtap_lock);
> - for (i = 0; i < MAX_MACVTAP_QUEUES && vlan->numvtaps; i++) {
> + for (i = 0; i < vlan->numvtaps; i++) {
> q = rcu_dereference_protected(vlan->taps[i],
> lockdep_is_held(&macvtap_lock));
> - if (q) {
> - qlist[j++] = q;
> - RCU_INIT_POINTER(vlan->taps[i], NULL);
> - RCU_INIT_POINTER(q->vlan, NULL);
> - vlan->numvtaps--;
> - }
> + BUG_ON(q == NULL);
> + qlist[j++] = q;
> + RCU_INIT_POINTER(vlan->taps[i], NULL);
> + RCU_INIT_POINTER(q->vlan, NULL);
> }
> - BUG_ON(vlan->numvtaps != 0);
> /* guarantee that any future macvtap_set_queue will fail */
> vlan->numvtaps = MAX_MACVTAP_QUEUES;
> spin_unlock(&macvtap_lock);
> --
> 1.7.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-23 11:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-23 3:12 [net-next RFC 0/8] multiqueue API support for macvtap Jason Wang
2013-05-23 3:12 ` [net-next RFC 1/8] macvlan: switch to use IS_ENABLED() Jason Wang
2013-05-23 11:31 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-23 3:12 ` [net-next RFC 2/8] macvtap: return -EBADFD when TUNGETIFF fails Jason Wang
2013-05-23 11:54 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-24 6:28 ` Jason Wang
2013-05-23 3:12 ` [net-next RFC 3/8] macvtap: introduce macvtap_get_vlan() Jason Wang
2013-05-23 15:11 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2013-05-24 6:21 ` Jason Wang
2013-05-23 3:12 ` [net-next RFC 4/8] macvlan: reduce the max number of taps to 8 Jason Wang
2013-05-23 6:37 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-24 5:14 ` Jason Wang
2013-05-23 3:12 ` [net-next RFC 5/8] macvtap: eliminate linear search Jason Wang
2013-05-23 11:41 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2013-05-24 5:33 ` Jason Wang
2013-05-23 3:12 ` [net-next RFC 6/8] macvtap: allow TUNSETIFF to create multiqueue device Jason Wang
2013-05-23 11:45 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-24 5:36 ` Jason Wang
2013-05-23 3:12 ` [net-next RFC 7/8] macvtap: add TUNSETQUEUE ioctl Jason Wang
2013-05-23 11:52 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-24 6:19 ` Jason Wang
2013-05-23 3:12 ` [net-next RFC 8/8] macvtap: enable multiqueue flag Jason Wang
2013-05-23 11:53 ` [net-next RFC 0/8] multiqueue API support for macvtap Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130523114109.GB17993@redhat.com \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.