From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Timo Teras Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/6] ipv4 fixes for dmvpn Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 09:33:15 +0300 Message-ID: <20130528093315.2a61b855@vostro> References: <1369653376-4731-1-git-send-email-timo.teras@iki.fi> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from mail-ea0-f177.google.com ([209.85.215.177]:62169 "EHLO mail-ea0-f177.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933008Ab3E1Gbf convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 May 2013 02:31:35 -0400 Received: by mail-ea0-f177.google.com with SMTP id q14so4299604eaj.8 for ; Mon, 27 May 2013 23:31:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1369653376-4731-1-git-send-email-timo.teras@iki.fi> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Dave, On Mon, 27 May 2013 14:16:10 +0300 Timo Ter=C3=A4s wrote: > Collection of pending fixes which mostly hit DMVPN setups, but some > are doing good to generic setups too. >=20 > Patches 1 & 2 fix the NOARP flag change to flush nud NOARP entries > from ARP cache. The only change from previous send is updating the > commit message per request, and adding Ben's Acked-By. I agree with Jiri, that these can be deferred until he gets the notifier improvements done. > Patch 3 reworks IPsec PMTU propagation to be less invasive, and fixes > certain subtle caching issues. >=20 > Patch 4 and 5 are performance improvements. Both are especially usefu= l > on dmvpn setups, but the latter patch helps general setups too. Seems you deferred also these patches 3-5. However, these are not dependant on the first two patches. Could these be taken a look at? These would be the patchwork items: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/246579/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/246575/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/246577/ Or should I resubmit them later? Thanks, Timo