From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>,
Martin Mokrejs <mmokrejs@fold.natur.cuni.cz>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
patches@linaro.org, linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: Fix potential NULL pointer dereference in acpi_processor_add()
Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 07:25:42 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130530222542.GD1630@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2969934.XTKV7y9VVT@vostro.rjw.lan>
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 03:57:58PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, May 30, 2013 10:29:54 AM Hanjun Guo wrote:
> > On 2013-5-29 19:07, Martin Mokrejs wrote:
> > > Hanjun Guo wrote:
> > >> On 2013-5-29 7:30, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > >>> On Thursday, May 23, 2013 08:44:26 PM Hanjun Guo wrote:
> > >>>> In acpi_processor_add(), get_cpu_device() will return NULL sometimes,
> > >>>> although the chances are small, I think it should be fixed.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
> > >>>
> > >>> This patch isn't necessary any more after the changes queued up for 3.11
> > >>> in the acpi-hotplug branch of the linux-pm.git tree.
> > >>
> > >> Ok, I noticed your patch set, just drop my patch.
> > >
> > > But shouldn't this go to stable at least? I checked linux-3.9.4
> > > and it applies fine. Whether this is relevant for other stable
> > > series I will leave up to somebody else. ;)
> >
> > Hi Rafeal,
> >
> > What's your opinion on Martin's suggestion?
>
> Well, this is kind of hard to say. We generally don't apply patches to -stable
> that don't have mainline counterparts.
>
> Greg, I wonder what your opinion is?
We do not apply patches to -stable that are not in Linus's tree, unless
there is no problem in Linus's tree due to a major rewrite of the code,
and it has been confirmed that the same problem isn't there.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-30 22:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-23 12:44 [PATCH] ACPI: Fix potential NULL pointer dereference in acpi_processor_add() Hanjun Guo
2013-05-28 23:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-05-29 1:38 ` Hanjun Guo
2013-05-29 11:07 ` Martin Mokrejs
2013-05-30 2:29 ` Hanjun Guo
2013-05-30 13:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-05-30 22:25 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2013-05-31 3:58 ` Hanjun Guo
2013-05-31 12:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130530222542.GD1630@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hanjun.guo@linaro.org \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mmokrejs@fold.natur.cuni.cz \
--cc=patches@linaro.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.