From: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>, Eugene Istomin <e.istomin@edss.ee>,
Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>,
xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] kernel 3.9.2 - xen 4.2.2/4.3rc1 => BUG unable to handle kernel paging request netif_poll+0x49c/0xe8
Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 16:47:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130531154730.GO4394@zion.uk.xensource.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130521152846.GP32007@zion.uk.xensource.com>
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 04:28:47PM +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 10:55:00AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > >>> On 17.05.13 at 15:00, Eugene Istomin <e.istomin@edss.ee> wrote:
> > > Bump, here it is:
> >
> > Okay, but I think we're still lacking information on what your
> > Dom0 kernel is.
> >
> > Ian, Wei - looking at the forward ported as well as the upstream
> > frontends, I'm wondering if there isn't a fundamental flaw in
> > ..._get_responses(): It allows up to MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 1 slots/
> > frags, and ..._fill_frags() then fills as many fragments as got
> > queued onto the respective list. Only after both of them are done,
> > __pskb_pull_tail() gets invoked reducing the fragment count by
> > one if the condition is met that made ..._get_responses() bump
> > the limit by one.
> >
> > Am I overlooking something? I'm asking because working through
> > disassembly and register values of the dump Eugene had sent I
> > clearly see that ..._fill_frags() is processing the 18th fragment,
>
> > while in that kernel version MAX_SKB_FRAGS is only 17 (but
> > possibly, hence the first question above, the Dom0 kernel still is
> > one with MAX_SKB_FRAGS being 18, or the packet turns out to
>
> I have the same suspection. However I just did a quick hack to bump
> MAX_SKB_FRAGS to 20 in backend, DomU worked just fine.
>
> > be such that it fills 17 fragments and the header is smaller than
> > RX_COPY_THRESHOLD).
>
Eugene,
I have more or less the same suspension as Jan did, but as I could not
effectively reproduce this problem upstream, could you please apply
following patch to opensuse kernel and see what happens.
Thanks
Wei.
-----
diff --git a/drivers/xen/netfront/netfront.c b/drivers/xen/netfront/netfront.c
index 6e5d233..ab7e35b 100644
--- a/drivers/xen/netfront/netfront.c
+++ b/drivers/xen/netfront/netfront.c
@@ -1319,6 +1319,7 @@ static RING_IDX xennet_fill_frags(struct netfront_info *np,
kfree_skb(nskb);
nr_frags++;
+ BUG_ON(nr_frags >= MAX_SKB_FRAGS);
}
shinfo->nr_frags = nr_frags;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-31 15:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 85+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <8511913.uMAmUdIO30@eistomin.edss.local>
2013-05-17 8:59 ` [Xen-users] kernel 3.9.2 - xen 4.2.2/4.3rc1 => BUG unable to handle kernel paging request netif_poll+0x49c/0xe8 Wei Liu
2013-05-17 9:08 ` Jan Beulich
2013-05-17 9:37 ` Eugene Istomin
2013-05-17 9:40 ` Eugene Istomin
2013-05-17 10:45 ` Jan Beulich
2013-05-17 12:03 ` Eugene Istomin
2013-05-17 12:25 ` Jan Beulich
2013-05-17 12:30 ` Eugene Istomin
2013-05-17 12:36 ` Jan Beulich
2013-05-17 12:52 ` Eugene Istomin
2013-05-17 13:00 ` Eugene Istomin
2013-05-18 10:06 ` Eugene Istomin
2013-05-20 6:52 ` Eugene Istomin
2013-05-20 8:58 ` Ian Campbell
2013-05-20 9:06 ` Wei Liu
2013-05-20 9:17 ` Eugene Istomin
2013-05-20 9:24 ` Wei Liu
2013-05-21 9:55 ` Jan Beulich
2013-05-21 11:09 ` Eugene Istomin
2013-05-21 11:49 ` Jan Beulich
2013-05-21 16:19 ` Eugene Istomin
2013-05-31 3:37 ` Eugene Istomin
2013-05-31 6:19 ` Jan Beulich
2013-05-31 6:22 ` Eugene Istomin
2013-05-31 8:20 ` Wei Liu
2013-05-21 15:28 ` Wei Liu
2013-05-31 15:47 ` Wei Liu [this message]
2013-05-31 16:00 ` Jan Beulich
2013-05-31 16:05 ` Wei Liu
2013-07-04 13:43 ` Dion Kant
2013-07-04 14:18 ` Jan Beulich
2013-07-04 15:01 ` Wei Liu
2013-07-05 9:32 ` [PATCH] xen-netfront: pull on receive skb may need to happen earlier Jan Beulich
2013-07-05 9:32 ` Jan Beulich
2013-07-05 14:53 ` Wei Liu
2013-07-07 1:10 ` David Miller
2013-07-07 1:10 ` David Miller
2013-07-08 9:59 ` Jan Beulich
2013-07-08 12:16 ` Dion Kant
2013-07-08 12:41 ` Jan Beulich
2013-07-08 12:41 ` Jan Beulich
2013-07-08 14:20 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich
2013-07-08 15:22 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-07-08 15:22 ` [Xen-devel] " Eric Dumazet
2013-07-09 7:47 ` Jan Beulich
2013-07-09 7:47 ` Jan Beulich
2013-07-08 15:48 ` [Xen-devel] " Wei Liu
2013-07-09 6:52 ` Jan Beulich
2013-07-09 6:52 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich
2013-07-09 16:51 ` Wei Liu
2013-07-10 6:58 ` Jan Beulich
2013-07-10 10:04 ` Wei Liu
2013-07-10 10:04 ` [Xen-devel] " Wei Liu
2013-07-10 10:46 ` Jan Beulich
2013-07-10 12:50 ` Ian Campbell
2013-07-10 12:50 ` [Xen-devel] " Ian Campbell
2013-07-10 12:53 ` Wei Liu
2013-07-10 12:53 ` [Xen-devel] " Wei Liu
2013-07-10 13:58 ` Jan Beulich
2013-07-10 13:58 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich
2013-07-10 10:46 ` Jan Beulich
2013-07-10 13:19 ` [Xen-devel] " Eric Dumazet
2013-07-10 13:19 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-07-10 6:58 ` Jan Beulich
2013-07-09 16:51 ` Wei Liu
2013-07-08 15:48 ` Wei Liu
2013-07-12 8:32 ` Wei Liu
2013-07-12 8:32 ` [Xen-devel] " Wei Liu
2013-07-12 8:56 ` Jan Beulich
2013-07-12 8:56 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich
2013-07-13 11:26 ` Dion Kant
2013-07-13 20:17 ` Dion Kant
2013-07-15 6:37 ` Jan Beulich
2013-07-13 11:26 ` Dion Kant
2013-07-08 14:20 ` Jan Beulich
2013-07-08 9:59 ` Jan Beulich
2013-07-05 14:53 ` Wei Liu
2013-07-05 9:36 ` kernel 3.9.2 - xen 4.2.2/4.3rc1 => BUG unable to handle kernel paging request netif_poll+0x49c/0xe8 Jan Beulich
2013-07-05 10:40 ` [Xen-users] " Dion Kant
2013-07-05 10:54 ` Wei Liu
2013-07-05 19:11 ` Dion Kant
2013-07-05 10:56 ` Jan Beulich
2013-07-05 19:46 ` Dion Kant
2013-07-06 13:36 ` Wei Liu
2013-07-08 8:25 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130531154730.GO4394@zion.uk.xensource.com \
--to=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=e.istomin@edss.ee \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.