From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>,
trinity@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] hw_breakpoint: Simplify the "weight" usage in toggle_bp_slot() paths
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2013 21:46:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130601194606.GC27149@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130601194526.GA27149@redhat.com>
Change toggle_bp_slot() to make "weight" negative if !enable. This
way we can always use "+ weight" without additional "if (enable)"
check and toggle_bp_task_slot() no longer needs this arg.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
---
kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c | 20 ++++++++------------
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c b/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c
index 21a3c88..2f4d7c4 100644
--- a/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c
+++ b/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c
@@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ fetch_this_slot(struct bp_busy_slots *slots, int weight)
/*
* Add a pinned breakpoint for the given task in our constraint table
*/
-static void toggle_bp_task_slot(struct perf_event *bp, int cpu, bool enable,
+static void toggle_bp_task_slot(struct perf_event *bp, int cpu,
enum bp_type_idx type, int weight)
{
/* tsk_pinned[n-1] is the number of tasks having n>0 breakpoints */
@@ -190,10 +190,7 @@ static void toggle_bp_task_slot(struct perf_event *bp, int cpu, bool enable,
int old_idx, new_idx;
old_idx = task_bp_pinned(cpu, bp, type) - 1;
- if (enable)
- new_idx = old_idx + weight;
- else
- new_idx = old_idx - weight;
+ new_idx = old_idx + weight;
if (old_idx >= 0)
tsk_pinned[old_idx]--;
@@ -211,22 +208,21 @@ toggle_bp_slot(struct perf_event *bp, bool enable, enum bp_type_idx type,
int cpu = bp->cpu;
struct task_struct *tsk = bp->hw.bp_target;
+ if (!enable)
+ weight = -weight;
+
/* Pinned counter cpu profiling */
if (!tsk) {
-
- if (enable)
- per_cpu(nr_cpu_bp_pinned[type], bp->cpu) += weight;
- else
- per_cpu(nr_cpu_bp_pinned[type], bp->cpu) -= weight;
+ per_cpu(nr_cpu_bp_pinned[type], cpu) += weight;
return;
}
/* Pinned counter task profiling */
if (cpu >= 0) {
- toggle_bp_task_slot(bp, cpu, enable, type, weight);
+ toggle_bp_task_slot(bp, cpu, type, weight);
} else {
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
- toggle_bp_task_slot(bp, cpu, enable, type, weight);
+ toggle_bp_task_slot(bp, cpu, type, weight);
}
if (enable)
--
1.5.5.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-01 19:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-20 16:19 WARN_ONCE in arch/x86/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c Vince Weaver
2013-05-28 17:00 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-05-28 17:28 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-05-28 18:47 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-05-29 16:32 ` [MAYBEPATCH] : " Oleg Nesterov
2013-06-01 18:20 ` [PATCH 0/2]: " Oleg Nesterov
2013-06-01 18:21 ` [PATCH 1/2] hw_breakpoint: Fix cpu check in task_bp_pinned(cpu) Oleg Nesterov
2013-06-13 14:20 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-06-01 18:21 ` [PATCH 2/2] hw_breakpoint: Use cpu_possible_mask in {reserve,release}_bp_slot() Oleg Nesterov
2013-06-15 12:46 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-06-01 19:45 ` [PATCH 0/3] hw_breakpoint: cleanups Oleg Nesterov
2013-06-01 19:45 ` [PATCH 1/3] hw_breakpoint: Simplify list/idx mess in toggle_bp_slot() paths Oleg Nesterov
2013-06-15 12:59 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-06-01 19:46 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2013-06-15 13:14 ` [PATCH 2/3] hw_breakpoint: Simplify the "weight" usage " Frederic Weisbecker
2013-06-01 19:46 ` [PATCH 3/3] hw_breakpoint: Introduce cpumask_of_bp() Oleg Nesterov
2013-06-15 13:29 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-06-13 14:01 ` [PATCH 0/3] hw_breakpoint: cleanups Frederic Weisbecker
2013-06-13 15:15 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-06-13 15:24 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-06-02 19:49 ` [PATCH 0/2] hw_breakpoint: more cleanups Oleg Nesterov
2013-06-02 19:50 ` [PATCH 1/2] hw_breakpoint: Simplify *register_wide_hw_breakpoint() Oleg Nesterov
2013-06-18 0:12 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-06-02 19:50 ` [PATCH 2/2] hw_breakpoint: Introduce "struct bp_cpuinfo" Oleg Nesterov
2013-06-18 12:37 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-06-18 14:42 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-06-18 17:01 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-06-19 15:54 ` Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130601194606.GC27149@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=trinity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.weaver@maine.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.