From: catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH V4] ARM: handle user space mapped pages in flush_kernel_dcache_page
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2013 14:58:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130605135817.GL8758@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130603173817.GA32211@schnuecks.de>
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 06:38:18PM +0100, Simon Baatz wrote:
> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 03:15:08PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 01:05:19PM +0100, Jason Cooper wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 05:43:35PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > > > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 08:16:57PM +0100, Simon Baatz wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 12:05:09PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > > > > > On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 06:35:56AM +0100, Simon Baatz wrote:
> > > > > > > Commit f8b63c1 made flush_kernel_dcache_page a no-op assuming that the pages
> > > > > > > it needs to handle are kernel mapped only. However, for example when doing
> > > > > > > direct I/O, pages with user space mappings may occur.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > After Nico's clarification, I think the original commit introducing this
> > > > > > function was also incomplete (commit 73be1591 - [ARM] 5545/2: add
> > > > > > flush_kernel_dcache_page() for ARM) since it ignores highmem pages and
> > > > > > their flushing could be deferred for a long time.
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes, I agree.
> > > > >
> > > > > > For my understanding (if I re-read this tread) - basically code like
> > > > > > this should not leave the user mapping inconsistent:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > kmap()
> > > > > > ...
> > > > > > flush_kernel_dcache_page()
> > > > > > kunmap()
> > ...
> > >
> > > wrt to 73be1591, this appears to go all the way back to v2.6.31.x... Can
> > > Simon go ahead and put this in rmk's patch tracker and mention that it
> > > should go to all -stable trees?
> >
> > I'm not sure how easy it is to apply this patch on past stable versions.
> > Maybe something simpler for stable like always flushing the cache in
> > flush_kernel_dcache_page() with optimisation only in recent stable
> > versions.
>
> Looking at how to adapt the change to previous kernel versions, it
> occurred to me that we could probably simplify the current patch
> since we can make stronger assumptions than __flush_dcache_page()
> can do. As discussed, __flush_dcache_page() does:
>
> addr = kmap_high_get(page);
> if (addr) {
> __cpuc_flush_dcache_area(addr, PAGE_SIZE);
> kunmap_high(page);
> }
>
> The kmap_high_get() is used to ensure that the page is/remains pinned
> during the flush. However, the API of flush_kernel_dcache_page()
> ensures that the page is already kmapped when it is called (as in the
> quoted example above).
>
> Thus, it is already pinned and we can simply look at page_address().
> If it is NULL, the page must have been obtained via kmap_atomic() and
> we don't need to flush anyway since kunmap_atomic() will do this.
Yes, that's the behaviour for __flush_dcache_page() already (VIVT).
> The actual flush covering both the lowmem and highmem cases actually
> is as simple as this (inspired by __flush_dcache_page() in 2.6.32):
>
> addr = page_address(page);
> #ifdef CONFIG_HIGHMEM
> /*
> * kmap_atomic() doesn't set the page virtual address, and
> * kunmap_atomic() takes care of cache flushing already.
> */
> if (addr)
> #endif
> __cpuc_flush_dcache_area(addr, PAGE_SIZE);
>
> If you agree that this makes sense, I will send a new version.
It makes sense (with the addition of the cache_is_vivt() check). Maybe
something like
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HIGHMEM) && addr)
to avoid the #ifdef.
> If we change the patch this way, there is no need to split off
> __flush_kernel_dcache_page() from __flush_dcache_page(), which also
> makes it simpler to apply to past stable kernels.
>
> The only thing we need to be aware of is the change of
> flush_kernel_dcache_page() in 2.6.37 (commit f8b63c1). In earlier
> versions, we would only need to fix the highmem case. However, I
> wonder whether it makes sense to apply a fix to 2.6.32 and 2.6.34
> without this ever being reported as a problem.
I think you can cc stable with a dependency for 2.6.37 onwards and send
a different patch for earlier versions directly to the
stable at vger.kernel.org alias, specifying the versions it needs to be
applied to.
--
Catalin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-05 13:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-12 5:35 [PATCH V4] ARM: handle user space mapped pages in flush_kernel_dcache_page Simon Baatz
2013-05-23 10:43 ` Catalin Marinas
2013-05-25 3:53 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-05-28 9:55 ` Catalin Marinas
2013-05-28 17:52 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-05-29 10:37 ` Catalin Marinas
2013-05-29 14:39 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-05-29 16:32 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-05-29 17:33 ` Catalin Marinas
2013-05-27 21:42 ` Simon Baatz
2013-05-28 10:20 ` Catalin Marinas
2013-05-28 18:50 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-05-29 11:05 ` Catalin Marinas
2013-05-29 19:16 ` Simon Baatz
2013-05-30 16:43 ` Catalin Marinas
2013-05-31 12:05 ` Jason Cooper
2013-05-31 14:15 ` Catalin Marinas
2013-05-31 14:20 ` Jason Cooper
2013-06-03 17:38 ` Simon Baatz
2013-06-03 18:03 ` Jason Cooper
2013-06-03 19:11 ` Simon Baatz
2013-06-03 19:22 ` Jason Cooper
2013-06-03 20:38 ` Greg KH
2013-06-05 13:58 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2013-06-05 19:55 ` Simon Baatz
2013-05-31 9:07 ` Ming Lei
2013-05-31 18:54 ` Simon Baatz
2013-06-01 10:27 ` Ming Lei
2013-06-03 9:33 ` Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130605135817.GL8758@arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.