All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com
Subject: Re: [net-next rfc V3 7/9] macvtap: allow TUNSETIFF to create multiqueue device
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2013 09:59:05 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130606065905.GA5170@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51AFFE59.2010808@redhat.com>

On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 11:13:29AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> On 06/05/2013 06:43 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 02:36:30PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> >> Though the queue were in fact created by open(), we still need to add this check
> >> to be compatible with tuntap which can let mgmt software use a single API to
> >> manage queues. This patch only validates the device name and moves the TUNSETIFF
> >> to a helper.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> > The patch is OK, the description is confusing.
> > What you mean is simply:
> >
> > 	Allow IFF_MULTI_QUEUE in TUNSETIFF for macvtap, to match
> > 	tun behaviour.
> >
> > And if you put it like this, I would say make this
> > the last patch in the series, so userspace
> > can use IFF_MULTI_QUEUE to detect new versus old
> > behaviour.
> 
> Make sense, thanks.
> >
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/net/macvtap.c |   51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> >>  1 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/macvtap.c b/drivers/net/macvtap.c
> >> index 5ccba99..14764cc 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/net/macvtap.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/net/macvtap.c
> >> @@ -869,6 +869,7 @@ out:
> >>  	return ret;
> >>  }
> >>  
> >> +
> >>  static struct macvlan_dev *macvtap_get_vlan(struct macvtap_queue *q)
> >>  {
> >>  	struct macvlan_dev *vlan;
> > Please don't.
> 
> Ok.
> >
> >> @@ -887,6 +888,44 @@ static void macvtap_put_vlan(struct macvlan_dev *vlan)
> >>  	dev_put(vlan->dev);
> >>  }
> >>  
> >> +static int macvtap_set_iff(struct file *file, struct ifreq __user *ifr_u)
> >> +{
> >> +	struct macvtap_queue *q = file->private_data;
> >> +	struct net *net = current->nsproxy->net_ns;
> >> +	struct inode *inode = file_inode(file);
> >> +	struct net_device *dev, *dev2;
> >> +	struct ifreq ifr;
> >> +
> >> +	if (copy_from_user(&ifr, ifr_u, sizeof(struct ifreq)))
> >> +		return -EFAULT;
> >> +
> >> +	/* To keep the same behavior of tuntap, validate ifr_name */
> > So I'm not sure - why is it important to validate ifr_name here?
> > We ignore the name for all other flags - why is IFF_MULTI_QUEUE
> > special?
> 
> It raises another question, why not validate ifname like tuntap? We
> should warn userspace about their error, otherwise they may create
> queues on the wrong device. In fact I want validate for both, but keep
> the behaviour w/o IFF_MULTI_QUEUE for backward compatibility.

Basically macvtap ignores ifr_name because it doesn't need it.
Making it ignore it without IFF_MULTI_QUEUE but
not with IFF_MULTI_QUEUE seems ugly.

Do you think we'll need ifr_name at some point?
Why not validate then, when we actually do?


> >
> >> +	if (ifr.ifr_flags & IFF_MULTI_QUEUE) {
> >> +		dev = __dev_get_by_name(net, ifr.ifr_name);
> >> +		if (!dev)
> >> +			return -EINVAL;
> >> +
> >> +		dev2 = dev_get_by_macvtap_minor(iminor(inode));
> >> +		if (!dev2)
> >> +			return -EINVAL;
> >> +
> >> +		if (dev != dev2) {
> >> +			dev_put(dev2);
> >> +			return -EINVAL;
> >> +		}
> >> +
> >> +		dev_put(dev2);
> >> +	}
> >> +
> >> +	if ((ifr.ifr_flags & ~(IFF_VNET_HDR | IFF_MULTI_QUEUE)) !=
> >> +	    (IFF_NO_PI | IFF_TAP))
> >> +		return -EINVAL;
> >> +	else
> >> +		q->flags = ifr.ifr_flags;
> >> +
> >> +	return 0;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >>  /*
> >>   * provide compatibility with generic tun/tap interface
> >>   */
> >> @@ -905,17 +944,7 @@ static long macvtap_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
> >>  
> >>  	switch (cmd) {
> >>  	case TUNSETIFF:
> >> -		/* ignore the name, just look at flags */
> > This is actually a useful comment that you've removed.
> 
> Will get it back.
> >
> >> -		if (get_user(u, &ifr->ifr_flags))
> >> -			return -EFAULT;
> >> -
> >> -		ret = 0;
> >> -		if ((u & ~IFF_VNET_HDR) != (IFF_NO_PI | IFF_TAP))
> >> -			ret = -EINVAL;
> >> -		else
> >> -			q->flags = u;
> >> -
> >> -		return ret;
> >> +		return macvtap_set_iff(file, ifr);
> >>  
> >>  	case TUNGETIFF:
> >>  		vlan = macvtap_get_vlan(q);
> >> -- 
> >> 1.7.1

  reply	other threads:[~2013-06-06  6:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-05  6:36 [net-next rfc V3 0/9] Multiqueue API for macvtap Jason Wang
2013-06-05  6:36 ` [net-next rfc V3 1/9] macvtap: fix a possible race between queue selection and changing queues Jason Wang
2013-06-05 10:35   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-06-05  6:36 ` [net-next rfc V3 2/9] macvtap: do not add self to waitqueue if doing a nonblock read Jason Wang
2013-06-05 11:07   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-06-05  6:36 ` [net-next rfc V3 3/9] macvlan: switch to use IS_ENABLED() Jason Wang
2013-06-05  6:36 ` [net-next rfc V3 4/9] macvtap: introduce macvtap_get_vlan() Jason Wang
2013-06-05  6:36 ` [net-next rfc V3 5/9] macvlan: change the max number of queues to 16 Jason Wang
2013-06-05  6:36 ` [net-next rfc V3 6/9] macvtap: eliminate linear search Jason Wang
2013-06-05  6:36 ` [net-next rfc V3 7/9] macvtap: allow TUNSETIFF to create multiqueue device Jason Wang
2013-06-05 10:43   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-06-06  3:13     ` Jason Wang
2013-06-06  6:59       ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2013-06-06  7:12         ` Jason Wang
2013-06-06  7:26           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-06-06  7:31             ` Jason Wang
2013-06-05  6:36 ` [net-next rfc V3 8/9] macvtap: add TUNSETQUEUE ioctl Jason Wang
2013-06-05 10:59   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-06-06  3:16     ` Jason Wang
2013-06-06  7:23       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-06-06  7:30         ` Jason Wang
2013-06-05  6:36 ` [net-next rfc V3 9/9] macvtap: enable multiqueue flag Jason Wang
2013-06-05 10:36 ` [net-next rfc V3 0/9] Multiqueue API for macvtap Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-06-06  3:07   ` Jason Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130606065905.GA5170@redhat.com \
    --to=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.