From: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@googlemail.com>
To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "C.B. Wang" <wtwangcb@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: carl9170:5/10 MHz Channel Support on carl9170
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2013 22:53:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201306062253.00787.chunkeey@googlemail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAB-Tk72epLsrQZ36bD2+RGDJgrMiYbMaK8-82=NQ8_fon8NQMw@mail.gmail.com>
(Readded ML).
On Thursday, June 06, 2013 02:21:58 PM C.B. Wang wrote:
> > maybe by the ar7010+ar92xy combo
> Yes.The ar9280 and ar9285 all support spectral analysis.Will
> ar9170+ar9104 combo also do the job?
No idea. I don't have the PHY docs, just the MAC.
> >Can you tell me on what page/chapter?
> On page 19,chapter 17,it says "The OFDM system also provides a
> “half-clocked” operation using 10 MHz channel spacings with data com-
> munications capabilities of 3, 4.5, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, and 27 Mbit/s."
> Also on page 31,there's a table describing OFDM PHY characteristics of
> 20MHz and 10MHz channel spacing for 802.11j.
Different page numbers here. So let's just stick to the chapter.
Anyway, If I'm reading it correctly it looks like OF1.7 aka
"10 MHz Channel spacing" is marked as an "O"ptional feature in A4.8.
The same seems to be true for the 4.9 GHz band (marked as optional
in OF3.12 in this old doc)?!
So, was this all a bit pointless? Because, as far as I can tell the
driver is 802.11j "compliant" as it is. Therefore let's close the
case with: "al[l|ready] done!".
Regards,
Chr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-06 20:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-04 13:20 carl9170:5/10 MHz Channel Support on carl9170 C.B. Wang
2013-06-04 19:43 ` Christian Lamparter
2013-06-05 12:59 ` C.B. Wang
2013-06-05 18:08 ` Adrian Chadd
2013-06-05 21:35 ` Christian Lamparter
2013-06-05 23:19 ` Adrian Chadd
2013-06-06 8:07 ` C.B. Wang
2013-06-06 8:17 ` Oleksij Rempel
2013-06-06 9:05 ` C.B. Wang
2013-06-06 11:09 ` Christian Lamparter
[not found] ` <CAB-Tk72epLsrQZ36bD2+RGDJgrMiYbMaK8-82=NQ8_fon8NQMw@mail.gmail.com>
2013-06-06 20:53 ` Christian Lamparter [this message]
[not found] ` <CAB-Tk72q_q5O-P9Y1+M5n7MX41PnsBHegr9M=KnuDStER2XxjQ@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <201306082052.27570.chunkeey@googlemail.com>
2013-06-09 12:06 ` C.B. Wang
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-06-04 13:13 C.B. Wang
2013-06-04 14:15 ` Simon Wunderlich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201306062253.00787.chunkeey@googlemail.com \
--to=chunkeey@googlemail.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wtwangcb@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.